- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:44:18 -0600
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa@w3.org
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:43:05 UTC
(Switched reply to IG list...) It sounds like something that we should talk about. Should I queue an issue, to be sure it isn't lost? I'm not sure that the new scheme is generally applicable (outside of accessibility arena), from what I read at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-WCAG20-20020822/#conformance But it would be good to understand the why and what of WAI's new approach here, and either confirm or modify our own approach. Do you want to pursue #1 below ("why")? -Lofton. At 11:35 AM 9/27/02 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >It seems that the WCAG WG, in their recently published Working Draft of >Web Content Accessibility Guidelines >(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-WCAG20-20020822/) has changed their >conformance criteria - from using Priorities to using Levels (Minimum, >Level 2, Level 3). As stated, the WCAG improvements include: Ensure that >requirements may be applied across technologies, Ensure that the >conformance requirements are clear, Ensure that the deliverables are easy >to use > >We may want to: >1. learn from them, why the change. >2. review our use of Priority 1,2,3. > >regards >Lynne >
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:43:05 UTC