- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:47:06 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: > > > Within the SpecGL, Section 6 References has the additional qualifier, > "(non-normative)". Although logic tells us that non-normative is the same > as informative, is there a reason that we did not label this section > "informative". The reason for this question, is that we don't define > non-normative but define informative. Additionally, Checkpoint 13.2 > states: Distinguish normative and informative text and Checkpoint 13.4 > states: use consistent terminology. > > My recommendation is obvious - replace non-normative with informative. ... and say once that informative implies non-normative (because it does not, in general). Alex.
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 14:47:09 UTC