"field of use" and free software
"field of use" bug in W3C patent policy
"field of use" restriction
"Royalty-free" Last Call Draft proposals
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Amazon Patent on Coordinating Gift Delivery
Bad idea
BEA comments on W3C RF Patent Policy
Comment about "RF"-patent-policy
Comment about W3C patent policy
Comment on the "last call draft"
Comments
Comments on patent policy
Comments on WD-patent-policy-20021114
Concerns about Field of Use
EPO President: Patents Unsuited for Software
FICPI Demands Unlimited Patentability Worldwide
field of use problems
Field of Use restriction
field of use restrictions
Free Software / Open Source compatibility
Free standards
FSF's Position on Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
GPL and LGPL incompatibilities in patent policy
GPL-Incompatible Web Standards
GPL-Incompatible Web Standards?
great concern regarding planned future W3C patent policy
I oppose including any patented technology in open standards.
in ref: W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing Requirements
- Terry (Saturday, 21 December)
IP Policy comments from the DAISY Consortium
Item 3 incompatibility with GPL section 7
Last Call draft of W3 Consortium Patent Policy Working Group
Libre Patent Manifesto Ver. 0.1
Limited domain a compromise, but much better than RAND
Limits based on Field of Use
No FoU in W3C standards (pretty pretty pleaaase)
No to patents in standards
No to the Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
objection
Objection to "field of use" restriction
Objection to the "field of use" restriction of proposed patent policy
Objection to the Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
Patent policy and GPL Section 7
Patent Policy Comment
patent policy may harm Free Software
patent policy of w3c
Patent royalties for standards ????
- Johnix (Saturday, 30 November)
patents
Patents in W3C standards
Pleace don't
PLEASE MAKE PATENT POLICY GPL COMPATIBLE
please, prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions on patent claims contributed to W3C standards.
Prohibition of "field of use" restrictions on contributed patents
Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy
Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy is inconflict with the GPL !!!
Reject "field of use" restrictions on W3C standards
Remove "field of use" restriction
revoke field-of-use restrictions
RF License requirements and GPL software
RF patent restriction is insufficient.
rf patents
Royalty Free Patents in "Standards"
Royalty-free patent licensing
Royalty-free patents in w3c
Section 3 of proposed patent policy
Summary of 2 December 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference
SUPPORT GNU, please!
Swedish Courts Oppose Unlimited Patentability
The TRIPS Treaty and Software Patents - FFII concerns about software patentability
This is very bad
W3 Consortium Patent Policy Working Group
W3 standards patent policies
W3C Patent Policy
W3C Patent policy and Free Softwares
- Jiba (Sunday, 1 December)
W3C Patent Policy: Comment on last call draft
W3C royalty-free vs. GNU public license
W3C standards
Who understands section 6 of RF Reqs?
Why restricting our freedom?
yet another GNU user
Your Patent Policy
你的公司有比較大嗎
- ivan (Friday, 13 December)
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 23:37:07 UTC