- From: Peter Berenyi <ber@sa.eol.hu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:04:14 +0100
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/TR/patent-policy/#sec-Requirements In W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing Requirements, section 6 you wrote: --- Begin SNIP [With respect to a Recommendation developed under this policy, a W3C Royalty-Free license shall mean a non-assignable, non-sublicensable license to make, have made, use, sell, have sold, offer to sell, import, and distribute and dispose of implementations of the Recommendation that:] [...] 6. may be suspended with respect to any licensee when licensor is sued by licensee for infringement of claims essential to implement any W3C Recommendation; --- End of SNIP I thougt I understood plain English pretty well, but this section is beyond me. Am I alone? Would anyone explain what it is supposed to mean in practice? If it means that an RF license which a W3C Recommendation is based on can be suspended any time using some legal buggering around, it is clearly unacceptable. Peace, Peter -- Peter Berenyi Systems Administrator email: ber@sa.eol.hu mobile +36 20 411 0580
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 05:04:19 UTC