Monday, 30 January 2006
Saturday, 28 January 2006
Sunday, 29 January 2006
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
Friday, 27 January 2006
- Re: Problems with <acronym>/<abbr> Tags and Web Browsers/handicapped Persons
- Re: Problems with <acronym>/<abbr> Tags and Web Browsers/handicapped Persons
- Re: Problems with <acronym>/<abbr> Tags and Web Browsers/handicapped Persons
- Re: Problems with <acronym>/<abbr> Tags and Web Browsers/handicapped Persons
- Re: Problems with <acronym>/<abbr> Tags and Web Browsers/handicapped Persons
Thursday, 26 January 2006
Tuesday, 24 January 2006
- Re: [XHTML2] Proposal: block[@kind] element (PR#7665)
- Re: [XHTML2] Scope of XHTML2 (PR#7760)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - dfn : Content model and usability (PR#7832)
Friday, 20 January 2006
Wednesday, 18 January 2006
- how can i get single scrollbar for multiple frame page
- how can i get single scrollbar for multiple frame page
- how can i get single scrollbar for multiple frame page
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
Tuesday, 17 January 2006
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
Monday, 16 January 2006
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: content type for XHTML fragments
- content type for XHTML fragments
- Re: HTML 4.01 Specification seems to have a Table variable just not there
Sunday, 15 January 2006
- Re: HTML 4.01 Specification seems to have a Table variable just not there
- Re: HTML 4.01 Specification seems to have a Table variable just not there
Saturday, 14 January 2006
Friday, 13 January 2006
- Re: Modularization question
- Re: Comments on "3.2. User Agent Conformance" in XHTML 1.0
- Re: Modularization question
- Comments on "3.2. User Agent Conformance" in XHTML 1.0
- Modularization question
Thursday, 12 January 2006
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
Wednesday, 11 January 2006
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- RE: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- RE: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
Tuesday, 10 January 2006
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- RE: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- IPTC starts testing the News Revolution
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- Re: Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?
- Will spacing issue after italics EVER be addressed?