Re: content type for XHTML fragments: reformulated

Garret Wilson wrote:
>  The former is a fragment of a web page on XHTML
> explaining how to use the <em> element, and actually displays the 
> literal string "<em>foo</em>".

Should the < and > not be encoded as &lt; and &gt; in that particular case?

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 20:04:49 UTC