- From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:08:38 +0100
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Jim Ley wrote: > "Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:43DCC855.80507@gmail.com... > >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I also don't see why would want to send it over the wire as >> application/xhtml+xml. >> >> Because it's not SVG/whatever. It *is* XHTML. >> > > but it is not an XHTML document. It cannot standalone as one, so it seems > to make little sense to send it as the same type as a standalone XHTML > document? > > Jim. Good point. Then application/xml would seem reasonable. Introducing an application/xhtml-fragment+xml may be overkill. Cheers, Daniel schierbeck
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 14:08:28 UTC