- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:44:53 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Shane McCarron <xhtml2-issues@hades.mn.aptest.com>
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Shane McCarron wrote: > > Jim, Jim? > The working group disagrees that this definition needs to be any tighter > - it is a high level, abstract introduction; not a normative conformance > requirement. This does not satisfy my request. Given the current text, I can't tell what the scope of this specification is. This is a problem for conformance to the QA Spec Guidelines, and with good reason: it makes it impossible to properly review this proposed spec. What kind of "documents" does XHTML2 attempt to address? What "wide range of purposes" is it intended to address? Is http://maps.google.com/ within the realm of intended applications? Is http://www.voidwars.com/ within the realm of intended applications? How about http://waronline.net/ or http://fslactivities.sd61.bc.ca/editez/? Please clarify the scope of the XHTML2 specification so that it can be properly reviewed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 18:44:58 UTC