- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:56:08 +0100
- To: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>
- Cc: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>, www-html@w3.org
Quoting Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>: > It's been a while since this thread ceased being active, but I've > been thinking of a more elegant way of transferring chunks of XHTML > between applications/documents. This could eventually be added to > XHTML 2.0. > > My proposal is to add a <fragment/> root element that encapsulates > the XHTML content being sent. That way you could send that content as > application/xhtml+xml. That would still require an update of RFC 3236. I also don't really see the advantage over using simply a <div> element with the namespace applied to it or some random element in another namespace. I also don't see why would want to send it over the wire as application/xhtml+xml. (Atom uses a <div> element as root for XHTML fragments.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 29 January 2006 12:56:10 UTC