Thursday, 20 December 2001
- Re: About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo
- Re: Comments for WD-xml-exc-c14n-20011120
- About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo
Wednesday, 19 December 2001
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
- XML Protocol comments on Exclusive Canonicalization
- Re: XML Signature Verification Response Interoperability/Schema Proposal
- XML Signature Verification Response Interoperability/Schema Proposal
Monday, 17 December 2001
Saturday, 15 December 2001
Friday, 14 December 2001
- Re: XMLP Comments to exc-c14n
- Fwd: XMLP Comments to XMLE LC
- Re: Erratum: XPaths in Canonical XML Recommendation
- RE: Erratum: XPaths in Canonical XML Recommendation
- Erratum: XPaths in Canonical XML Recommendation
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and inter-op update
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and inter-op update
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and inter-op update
- New XML Signature implementation and inter-op update
- RE: The reference processing model
- Re: The reference processing model
- Re: The reference processing model
Friday, 7 December 2001
Sunday, 9 December 2001
Friday, 7 December 2001
- RE: Determining the presence of an XML signature
- Re: XML Signature is "evil" ;-))
- Re: XML Signature is "evil" ;-))
- Re: XML Signature is "evil" ;-))
- XML Signature is "evil" ;-))
Thursday, 6 December 2001
- Re: Clarification on section 3.2.1 (Reference Validation)
- Clarification on section 3.2.1 (Reference Validation)
Wednesday, 5 December 2001
Tuesday, 4 December 2001
Monday, 3 December 2001
Sunday, 2 December 2001
Friday, 30 November 2001
- Re: The reference processing model
- Re: The reference processing model
- Java implementors: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2650] - Namespace axis resolution is not XPath compliant (fwd)
Thursday, 29 November 2001
- Re: Exclusive Canonicalization "with Comments"
- xml security lecture / paper / chapter
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Security
Wednesday, 28 November 2001
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Security
- Exclusive Canonicalization "with Comments"
- ANN: Canonical XML for Perl
Tuesday, 27 November 2001
Monday, 26 November 2001
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Canonical XML and xmlns:xml
- Re: Fwd: Re: Last Call: Exclusive Canonical XML
Wednesday, 21 November 2001
Tuesday, 20 November 2001
Monday, 19 November 2001
Friday, 16 November 2001
- Re: Exclusive XML Canonicalization Example (Interop?)
- RE: Exclusive XML Canonicalization Example (Interop?)
- RE: Exclusive XML Canonicalization Example (Interop?)
Thursday, 15 November 2001
Wednesday, 14 November 2001
Tuesday, 13 November 2001
Monday, 5 November 2001
- Typo in 4.4.2.1 in Digital Signature PR
- Re: Missing "(" in dtd?
- Missing "(" in dtd?
- RE: Processing model for ds:Reference/@Type
Friday, 2 November 2001
Thursday, 1 November 2001
Wednesday, 31 October 2001
- Re: Defective Sign-and-Encrypt Article in Nov. 2001 DDJ
- Re: Defective Sign-and-Encrypt Article in Nov. 2001 DDJ
- Defective Sign-and-Encrypt Article in Nov. 2001 DDJ
Tuesday, 30 October 2001
Monday, 29 October 2001
- Re: My latest try on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: My latest try on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: My latest try on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
Friday, 26 October 2001
Thursday, 25 October 2001
Wednesday, 24 October 2001
Tuesday, 23 October 2001
Sunday, 21 October 2001
Friday, 19 October 2001
Thursday, 18 October 2001
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt
- Re: MAC and HMAC
- Re: MAC and HMAC
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt
- Re: MAC and HMAC
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt
- Re: Core Validation question
- Re: Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
- Re: Processing model for ds:Reference/@Type
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-02.txt
- Re: Processing model for ds:Reference/@Type
- Xerces 1.4.4: Exposing XML Schema normalized values [README] (fwd)
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- Re: Processing model for ds:Reference/@Type
Wednesday, 17 October 2001
- Re: Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
- Re: Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
- Re: Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
- RE: New data format to substitute Canonical XML ?!?
- Re: New data format to substitute Canonical XML ?!?
- New data format to substitute Canonical XML ?!?
- C14n of reference: was RE: URI References clarifications
- RE: URI References clarifications
Tuesday, 16 October 2001
- Re: URI References clarifications
- URI References clarifications
- Re: Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
- Misleading sentence in 3.2.1 Reference Validation
Monday, 15 October 2001
- spec status, x509 structures, and Reference URI
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
Saturday, 13 October 2001
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- Re: MAC and HMAC
- Re: CryptoBinary and base64Binary clarification
Friday, 12 October 2001
- RE: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- RE: Processing model for ds:Reference/@Type
- RE: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (redux)
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (redux)
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- Re: Again: Signing a ds:Object - what's the right XPath
- Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (redux)
Thursday, 11 October 2001
- Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (redux)
- RE: Use of namespace prefix in XML-Signature
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- Re: Use of namespace prefix in XML-Signature
- Re: Use of namespace prefix in XML-Signature
- Again: Signing a ds:Object - what's the right XPath
- Use of namespace prefix in XML-Signature
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
Wednesday, 10 October 2001
- Clarification on 4.3.3.1 -- elided URI attributes
- CryptoBinary and base64Binary clarification
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
- Re: Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
- Clarification on 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3
Tuesday, 9 October 2001
Monday, 8 October 2001
- Re: New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- New XML Signature implementation and Update for Inter-Op
- XML Signature C++ Implementation
Friday, 5 October 2001
Thursday, 4 October 2001
Wednesday, 3 October 2001
Tuesday, 2 October 2001
- XML Security for Multipart MIME
- Re: Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
- Re: Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation