- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:14:39 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Cc: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org, xmldsig <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Thank you for your comments David. On Friday 14 December 2001 14:31, David Fallside wrote: > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Dec/0175.html > Exc-C14N specific: > For example, the C14N specs do not deal with insignificant > transformations permitted by various XML Schema built-in datatypes > such as use of {true,false,0,1} for boolean datatype, or > case-insensitivity to "e" in scientific notation. This is correct. exc-c14n is a tweak to Canonical XML, which is based on Xpath, and preceded both InfoSet and Schema. I expect Infoset and Schema aware canonicalizations will be proposed and may even be the subject of chartered work of future activity -- not necessarily xmldsig. However, I do have a draft for addressing validating augmentations as a xmldsig transform [e] and some thoughts on schema aware canonicalization. But presently, it's "unchartered" territory. [e] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-transform-xml-validation.html > Minor comment on definition of terms: > If "an orphan node is a node whose parent element node is not in the > document subset" > then how can there be an "output parent of an orphan node" if this is > defined to be > "the output parent of an orphan node .. is the nearest > ancestor element of the orphan node that is in the document subset"? Input: <a><b><c/></b></a> o a is an ancestor (grandparent) of c. o b is an ancestor (parent) of c. Output <a><c/></a> o b is absent. o a is an "output parent" of c since its the most immediate ancestor in the output of <c/>. This text is John's and I had to draw an example tree and label these things to first grok the terminology. Subsequently, I acknowledge other readers might have to make a similar effort, but I've been unable to come up with an alternative that is better expressed. Suggestions? -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 17:14:53 UTC