- From: Brian LaMacchia <bal@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:13:54 -0700
- To: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
XMLDSIG Section 4.3.3.1 contains this paragraph which identifies when you can elide the URI attribute on a Reference: If the URI attribute is omitted altogether, the receiving application is expected to know the identity of the object. For example, a lightweight data protocol might omit this attribute given the identity of the object is part of the application context. This attribute may be omitted from at most one Reference in any particular SignedInfo, or Manifest. What is the justification for the restriction embodied in the last sentence? Once you elide a single URI attribute from a Reference, you're guaranteed to be in an application-specific domain where the verifier must have out-of-band knowledge to match up Reference and referenced content. Given that the receiving application has to know how to find one referenced object, why can't it know implicitly how to find multiple referenced objects and match them up? Since we're talking about application-specific context anyway there's no interop issue, so what's the benefit of having the restriction on elided URLs? Unless there's a compelling reason to keep the restriction (which I can't see), I suggest we remove it and delete the last sentence of the quoted paragraph from 4.3.3.1. --bal
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 14:15:33 UTC