- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:50:10 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org, XML Signature WG <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: John Boyer <jboyer@PureEdge.com>, Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>, Joseph Kesselman <Joseph_Kesselman@lotus.com>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
--On Dienstag, 27. November 2001 14:32 -0500 Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> wrote: >> At the moment, I don't know whether this makes sense or causes problems. >> Do you have some thoughts about that? > > Regardless of what is happening in XPath/DOM, I believe Canonicalization > allows us to ignore it [2] regardless, right? > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#ProcessingModel > Element Nodes- ... Namespace Axis-...To finish processing L, simply > process every namespace node in L, except omit namespace node with local > name xml, which defines the xml prefix, if its string value is > http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace. Hm, it would be good to read the spec from time to time again ;-)) I simply did ignore that sentence cause I had no problem with that till now. I'll add a fix for that. Christian
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2001 14:47:33 UTC