- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 07:43:26 -0700
- To: "'Carl Ellison'" <cme@acm.org>, Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F405869802@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
Given that virtually every XML document on earth only uses 64 distinct symbols a 25% saving in space can be achieved using a cheesy FSR that could be written in about 30 minutes. The odd thing about the return of the Forces of ASN.1 is that reusing the ASN.1 encoding format buys you precisely nothing if you are using the XML data model. You can't use any existing ASN.1 tools and using any of the toolkits would give you even more indigestion than usual. In other venues the Forces of ASN.1 have claimed much higher compression - from 200 bytes to 6. My response is that MD5 is guaranteed to compress *any* bit stream of any length to 16 bytes and is only marginally harder to decode than some of the more insane forms of ASN.1. Phill Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng. Principal Scientist VeriSign Inc. pbaker@verisign.com 781 245 6996 x227 > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Ellison [mailto:cme@acm.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:36 AM > To: Christian Geuer-Pollmann > Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > Subject: Re: New data format to substitute Canonical XML ?!? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > At 01:01 PM 10/17/2001 +0200, Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >just for your personal entertainment: > > > >http://www.eddf.org/ > >http://www.globera.com/eddf.php3 > > > >Seems some people can't live without ASN.1 ;-)) > > > >Christian > > > > Only 25% shorter than XML? > > Canonical S-expressions [CSEXP] (as used in SPKI/SDSI) is also a > binary format, is 1:1 with a major subset of XML (see > http://world.std.com/~cme/html/spki.html#XML), and is about 50% > shorter. Then again, CSEXP is almost always shorter than traditional > ASN.1 without any XML compatibility. > > Of course, %-shorter is strictly a function of the ratio of tags to > content and is a pretty meaningless measurement apart from a real > document. > > - Carl > > [P.S. for some reason, Netscape gets to the #XML tagged line above > but IE doesn't.] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 6.5.8 > > iQA/AwUBO817KnPxfjyW5ytxEQINlgCfZapTJy1Gm4+btNQFkvBdj0Zh2S4AoIwV > lndL3AxlCqs3rOR4sHcrcsop > =Rgmh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > +------------------------------------------------------------------+ > |Carl M. Ellison cme@acm.org http://world.std.com/~cme | > | PGP: 08FF BA05 599B 49D2 23C6 6FFD 36BA D342 | > +--Officer, officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a dirty song.-+ >
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: Phillip_Hallam-Baker__E-mail_.vcf
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 10:43:24 UTC