Friday, 31 October 2008
- RE: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- RE: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- Re: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- RE: Static error XS0045
- RE: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- Re: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- Re: Static error XS0045
- Re: Possible problems with unsupported steps
- Static error XS0045
- Possible problems with unsupported steps
Thursday, 30 October 2008
- Re: XSLT: initial template
- Re: Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- Re: XSLT: initial template
- Re: Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- Re: XSLT: initial template
- Re: Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- Re: Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- Re: XSLT: initial template
- RE: Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- Dynamic @href value for p:document?
- XSLT: initial template
Monday, 27 October 2008
- Re: p:xpath-context bound to a sequence of documents
- Re: p:viewport - number of matching documents
- err:XS0003 and err:XS0022 - duplicates?
- p:viewport-source - err:XD0006 or err:XD0003?
- p:xpath-context bound to a sequence of documents
- p:viewport - number of matching documents
Thursday, 23 October 2008
- [closed] Re: Detecting errors
- [closed] Re: Standard C14N method or option for serialization?
- [closed] Re: split-sequence: position() and last()
- Re: Detecting errors
- [closed] Re: Make 5.7.2 consistent wrt context node
Tuesday, 21 October 2008
- Re: Standard C14N method or option for serialization?
- Standard C14N method or option for serialization?
- Re: Make 5.7.2 consistent wrt context node
- Re: p:log on atomic steps?
- Re: p:log on atomic steps?
Monday, 20 October 2008
Sunday, 19 October 2008
Thursday, 16 October 2008
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
Tuesday, 14 October 2008
Thursday, 9 October 2008
- Re: Detecting errors
- Re: Detecting errors
- Re: Detecting errors
- RE: Detecting errors
- Re: Detecting errors
- Detecting errors
Sunday, 5 October 2008
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- Re: On the interpretation of match=
- On the interpretation of match=
Friday, 3 October 2008
- Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
- Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
Thursday, 2 October 2008
- Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
- Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
- Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
- [closed] Re: Proposal for XProc: add output port to p:validate-with-xml-schema
- [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect
- [closed] Re: LCWD comment on p:validate-with-schematron
- [closed] Re: XProc comment