W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [closed] Re: p:validate-with-schematron report defect

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:59:55 +0200
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0810030659w711140ech60f91ffc6512e87b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

2008/10/3 Norman Walsh wrote:

> I understand your concern, but the WG is trying to be
> pragmatic.

  So do I.  I thought that being not able to rely on the output format
would make this step totally unusable, but Luis remined me that I
could simply test what the report root element or namespace is (and so
infer what the format is.)

  A shame that I didn't think about that myself :-(

  So at the end of the day I think I am satisfied by the WG's decision
(including reports as well as asserts, and not setting the output

  Thanks for having taken that into account.


Florent Georges
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 14:00:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:41:08 UTC