- From: Rui Lopes <rlopes@di.fc.ul.pt>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:00:40 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 00:01:18 UTC
Florent Georges wrote: > 2008/10/2 Norman Walsh wrote: > >> The WG agreed to suggest that the output SHOULD be SVRL. > > That's better than nothing. On the other side, that means that one > can not rely on the step's output format, thus she couldn't use the > report output to transform it in HTML for instance, nor to report any > meaningful info to the user in any way. > > Maybe we could have an optional option to set the expected report > format (html, svrl, or an implementation-defined value) ? You can do an XPath test (with p:choose) to evaluate the report's outcome to achieve the same kind of functionality without adding a new option to the step. Do you think that it suffices? Cheers, Rui
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 00:01:18 UTC