- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:34:31 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> I'm happy to try to clarify the situation, but I think XS0044 covers > both cases. If there's no declaration for foo:whatever, then > it's an element > child not allowed by this specification. I guess it all depends on how you read the phrase "not allowed by this specification". I just took the schema for p:pipeline, and then looked at the definition of subpipeline. There it says that a subpipeline can contain any number of p:standard-step or pfx:user-pipeline. There I stopped. But I can see where was the problem now... I should have read further, because in sections 4.7 (Atomic steps) and 4.8 (Extension steps) it says that "there must be a visible step declaration at the point of use"... So I was probably wrong here. But I still think that S0044 should make it more clear that it is not only about the XProc schema... (Side note to Mohamed: You don't have to revert my changes to the test for XS0044, I will do it myself :-) Regards, Vojtech
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 14:35:40 UTC