- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:52:36 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2008/10/2 Norman Walsh wrote: > The WG agreed to suggest that the output SHOULD be SVRL. That's better than nothing. On the other side, that means that one can not rely on the step's output format, thus she couldn't use the report output to transform it in HTML for instance, nor to report any meaningful info to the user in any way. Maybe we could have an optional option to set the expected report format (html, svrl, or an implementation-defined value) ? Best regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 18:53:12 UTC