Re: p:log on atomic steps?

"Josh Matthews" <joshmatthews@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> At present, p:log is only allowed on compound steps. Was this intentional?
>
> Are you sure? I have been using it on atomic steps - the step grammar allows
> it:
>
> <p:atomic-step
>   name? = NCName>
>     (p:input |
>      p:with-option |
>      p:with-param |
>      p:log)*
> </p:atomic-step>

Ah. More evidence that it's a spec bug. If you look at the description
of the built-in steps, it's not listed anywhere.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Not only are there no happy endings,
http://nwalsh.com/            | there aren't even any endings.
                              | (American Gods)--Neil Gaiman