public-ws-addressing@w3.org from March 2006 by author

Alastair Green

• Re: Use or abuse of [reply endpoint] property? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Use or abuse of [reply endpoint] property? (Tuesday, 14 March)

Anish Karmarkar

• Proposal for issue CR23 (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: UPDATED proposed text (Thursday, 2 March)

Bob Freund

• Minutes from the 2006-03-27 distributed meeting are available for review (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Agenda, WS-Addressing WG Note time changes and shortened meeting (Saturday, 25 March)
• Agenda, WS-Addressing WG Note time changes and shortened meeting (Saturday, 25 March)
• Minutes, distributed meeting 2006-03-20 (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting 2006-03-20 (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: Minutes, was Re: Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting, March 13, 2006 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Resolution of LC116 (Monday, 13 March)
• Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting, March 13, 2006 (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Testing Results (Thursday, 9 March)
• Draft Minutes 2006-03-02/03 face to face meeting are available for review at: (Thursday, 9 March)
• Final editorial corrections, SOAP Binding (Sunday, 5 March)
• Correction to minutes of Feb 20 distributed meeting (Saturday, 4 March)

Bob Freund-Hitachi

• Congratulations: Core and SOAP are now pr, ror WG note published; Well done everyone. (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Correction to minutes of Feb 20 distributed meeting (Sunday, 5 March)
• W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - Face to Face meeting agenda Mar 2-3 2006 (Thursday, 2 March)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: UPDATED proposed text (Thursday, 2 March)

David Hull

• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Draft Minutes 2006-02-20 distributed meeting (Thursday, 2 March)

David Orchard

• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding (Thursday, 2 March)
• RE: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding (Thursday, 2 March)
• SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding (Thursday, 2 March)

Glen Daniels

• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• FW: DestinationUnreachable??? from msft (Friday, 3 March)

Hugo Haas

• Changes for LC112 resolution (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: CR namespace warning. (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Resolution of LC116 (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting, March 13, 2006 (Monday, 13 March)
• cr3 suggestion (was Re: Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting, March 13, 2006) (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: PR drafts comments: typos and WS-Security reference (Monday, 13 March)
• PR drafts comments: typos and WS-Security reference (Friday, 10 March)
• Core and WSDL binding snapshots to review (Friday, 3 March)
• Re: bridge open again? (Thursday, 2 March)

Jonathan Marsh

• Infoset ref - second edition? (Monday, 13 March)
• Comparing IRIs: anon and none (Monday, 13 March)
• CR namespace warning. (Monday, 13 March)
• CR23 resolution? (Thursday, 9 March)
• CR optional features status (Wednesday, 1 March)

Katy Warr

• Specifying cardinality of WSDL Metadata (Monday, 27 March)
• Typos in SOAP binding spec (Monday, 27 March)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Typos in SOAP binding spec (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: delimiter or not in default fault action example (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: Use or abuse of [reply endpoint] property? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Resolution of LC116 (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: Comparing IRIs: anon and none (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: CR namespace warning. (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: PR drafts comments: typos and WS-Security reference (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: CR23 resolution? (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: Final editorial corrections, SOAP Binding (Monday, 6 March)

Mark Baker

• Re: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding (Thursday, 2 March)

Mark Little

• Next week's meeting (Thursday, 9 March)
• bridge open again? (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - Face to Face meeting agenda Mar 2-3 2006 (Thursday, 2 March)

paul.downey@bt.com

• time changes .. (Monday, 27 March)
• Testing Results (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Final editorial corrections, SOAP Binding (Sunday, 5 March)
• RE: CR 23 omnibus (Thursday, 2 March)

Pete Wenzel

• Minutes, was Re: Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting, March 13, 2006 (Tuesday, 14 March)

Richard Salz

• Re: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding (Thursday, 2 March)

Rogers, Tony

• Resolution of LC116 (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: Proposal for issue CR23 (Thursday, 2 March)

Stefan Illner

• delimiter or not in default fault action example (Monday, 20 March)

Yalcinalp, Umit

• regrets (Monday, 13 March)

Yves Lafon

• mU fault one way test (Thursday, 30 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 March 2006 16:45:50 UTC