Just to clarify, this test gives wsa:FaultTo = none, but expects the mU fault to come back as a response. This is consistent with mU faults preventing WSA from being engaged. Normal behavior without WSA engaged would be for the fault to come back as a response. If WSA had instead been engaged, the fault would have been dropped. In other words, the test is consistent with the spec as it stands now. Is that correct? Hugo Haas wrote: >* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2006-03-13 12:08-0800] > > >>I agree with what I think are Chris/Dave's position, that WS-A info MUST >>not be used for formulating MAPs when an mU fault is generated. >> >>Said differently, the WS-A header blocks are not treated differently >>than other header blocks. >> >>To do otherwise would be potentially dangerous. >> >> > >Note that we have a test for this scenario in our test suite: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1238 > >Cheers, > >Hugo > > >
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 20:48:56 UTC