Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go? from Hugo Haas on 2006-03-13 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from March 2006)

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:43:42 +0100
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>, Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20060313204342.GI22995@w3.org>

* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2006-03-13 12:08-0800]
> I agree with what I think are Chris/Dave's position, that WS-A info MUST
> not be used for formulating MAPs when an mU fault is generated.
> 
> Said differently, the WS-A header blocks are not treated differently
> than other header blocks.
> 
> To do otherwise would be potentially dangerous.  

Note that we have a test for this scenario in our test suite:

    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1238

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 20:44:06 UTC