- From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:09:16 +0000
- To: Bob Freund-Hitachi <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- CC: "[WS-A]" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
It's lonely on the bridge at the moment ;-) Mark. Bob Freund-Hitachi wrote: > > W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group – Face to Face meeting > agenda Mar 2-3 2006 > > Dial-in information on WG Admin page http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin > Meeting Room Iles B > > March 2 All times Central European Time > > 09:00 Call to order > > 1. Roll call, select scribe for both days > (see scribe list below) > > 2. Agenda review, AOB > > 3. Call for corrections to the minutes > > - 2006-02-20: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/6/02/20-ws-addr-minutes.html > > 4. Progression Plan > -Core – cleaned up pub for final WG review by March 13 > -SOAP – cleaned up pub for final WG review By March 13 > -WSDL – LC closes March end, get to CR by April 17 > > 4. Review action items http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin#actionitems > 2006-01-19: David Orchard to draft SOAP 1.1 one-way binding WG Note. DONE > 2006-02-20: Katy Warr to Propose text and drive issue cr23 DONE > > 5. Proposed CR Issues > > Proposed 1: Use SOAP 1.2 properties where possible in describing SOAP > 1.2 behavior. http://www.w3.org/mid/43EA49FF.70603@tibco.com > <dhtmled1://exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.w3.org/mid/43EA49FF.70603@tibco.com> > > > Proposed 2: Use of predefined fault actions for application faults > [was FW: Action in 1133, 1134] > http://www.w3.org/mid/37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801B6775A@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com > <dhtmled1://exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.w3.org/mid/37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801B6775A@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> > > > 10:00 Break > > 10:30 > > 6. Conclusion and completion of “one paragraph” out-optional-in note > > 7. CR Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/cr-issues/> > > * cr23 - cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution > Owner: Katy Warr > > 12:00 Lunch > > 14:00 > > * cr21 - Resolution of CR17 introduced contradiction > > 15:00 break > > 16:00 Test status and report > Redaction of features as indicated by test experience > * wsa:ProblemHeader - testcases 1145 and 1245 > * wsa:UnreachableDestination – testcase 1260 > > Adjourn at 17:30 > > March 3 > > 09:00 Resume > 1. Disposition of features at risk > > 10:00 break > > 11:00 obstacles to rec status > Closure of remaining CR issues > Instruction to prepare PR documents for Core and SOAP > > 12:00 Lunch > > 14:00 LC issues as received <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/> > > * lc109 - Should [fault endpoint] be required for robust in-only message? > > * lc110 - Should [fault endpoint] be prohibited in Robust in-only > fault messages? > > * lc111 - Section 3.1.1 clarity > > * lc112 - Three states in two > > * lc113 - Section 3.3 clarity > > Proposal 1: > > In WSDL 2.0, a SOAP Module component may be used to declare the > > use of the WS-Addressing 1.0 Module for the SOAP binding. The > > meaning of the use of such a SOAP Module component is semantically > > equivalent to the {addressing required} property defined in > > section 3.1.1. Note that this module is only meaningful when used > > on WSDL components where the {addressing required} property is > > allowed, i.e. as a member of the {soap modules} property of a > > Binding component. > > * cr114 - Typos in section 2.1 > > * cr115 - Example 4-1 is wrong > > * cr116 - use of wsa:ReferenceParameters > > 15:00 break > > 17:30 close > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Scribe list > > A participant from the Member at the top of the list is expected to > scribe the meeting. If no participant from that Member is able to > scribe, a participant from the next Member on the list is expected to > scribe, and so forth. After one participant from a Member scribes, > that Member's name goes to the bottom of the list. > > Systinet > Sonoa > Hitachi > HP > Oracle > ERICSSON > IONA > Nortel > Sun > Microsoft > webMethods > WSO2 > JBoss > Fujitsu > TIBCO > Sonic > W3C > SAP > BT > BEA > CA > IBM > > See <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/minutes.html> for more information > about taking minutes. >
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 08:09:06 UTC