- From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:53:03 +1100
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BEE2BD647C052D4FA59B42F5E2D946B304DF35@AUSYMS12.ca.com>
It may be that I'm just a bit tired (it's 1am) but I am having trouble determining where to put the resolution of LC116. The resolution is phrased: Add a {reference parameters} property to the WSDL 2.0 component model, with the same type as the [reference parameters] property in Core 2.1 Is this meant to be a new section under section 4? Should it be an extension to 4.3 (which talks about Reference Parameters, but only in the context of wsa:ReferenceParameters as an extension to the endpoint or port element)? My current inclination is to make the current content of 4.3 into section 4.3.1, and to add a section 4.3.2 WSDL 2.0 Component Model Changes. Does that sound like a reasonable approach, or will it evoke screams of wrath? BTW: I've implemented all the other closed LC issues with the WSDL binding doc. We are waiting on Hugo's AI to resolve LC112, so at the moment section 3.1.1 only reflects the impact of LC111 (LC112 will probably change it more). Tony Rogers CA, Inc Senior Architect, Development tony.rogers@ca.com
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 13:53:15 UTC