public-webrtc@w3.org from August 2017 by date

Thursday, 31 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Ordering of SRD promise resolving vs. track "mute" event Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• Async part of RTCRtpSender.setParameters Adam Bergkvist

Wednesday, 30 August 2017

• Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a revised Candidate Recommendation of “Media Capture and Streams” Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Adding `remoteTrackId` attribute to represent SDP-signaled track ID. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add a section summarizing different ICE candidate events. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

Tuesday, 29 August 2017

• [webrtc-stats] Do the "audio level" stats include MediaStreamTrack volume settings? Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: close all DtlsTransports in pc.close() (including sctp.transport) Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy Andreas Pehrson via GitHub
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Taylor Brandstetter
• [webrtc-pc] Ambiguities with BUNDLE and ICE Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

Monday, 28 August 2017

• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• [webrtc-pc] How to handle removing and re-adding remote streams/tracks - possible ID collisions? henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Add stat to reflect the redundancy of FEC/RED data minyuel via GitHub

Friday, 25 August 2017

• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Taylor Brandstetter
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Taylor Brandstetter
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify which session description to check for if negotiation is needed Soares Chen via GitHub
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Randell Jesup

Thursday, 24 August 2017

• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Taylor Brandstetter
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Taylor Brandstetter
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Byron Campen
• BUNDLE nightmare when first media section becomes inactive Iñaki Baz Castillo
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: setParameters: Do argument checks in sync section Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reference rtcweb-data-channel for RTCPriorityType enum. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Throw if a DataChannel, negotiated by the script, lacks id Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make fields in RTCStats required Soares Chen via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update mandatory to implement stats fields to sync with webrtc-stats Soares Chen via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix reference to validating assertion result in requesting assertions Soares Chen via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: replace "a RTCsomething" with "an RTCsomething" Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: What algorithms the browser supports Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Harmonize and update our references to other specifications Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify the meaning of session description sdp need not match Soares Chen via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Validate binaryType value when setting it in RTCDataChannel Soares Chen via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Allow createAnswer to be called only in valid signaling state Soares Chen via GitHub
• Re: WebRTC September 2017: Date and time Stefan Håkansson LK
• WebRTC September 2017: Date and time Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add note that IdP must treat contents as opaque Soares Chen via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Wait for certificate to be generated before identity assertion process Soares Chen via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 August 2017

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Use automatically generated default toJSON() method (when available) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• New webrtc-pc Editor's draft (v20170822) Adam Bergkvist

Monday, 21 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Revert JSON changes Bernard Aboba via GitHub

Saturday, 19 August 2017

• [webrtc-stats] Dated getStats example. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: s/outboundrtp/outbound-rtp Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• Re: Doodle for September Virtual Interim Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-pc] Invalid JSON in examples Cullen Jennings via GitHub

Friday, 18 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: duration, interToneGap and canInsertDTMF internal slots of RTCDTMFSender Bernard Aboba via GitHub

Thursday, 17 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: getCapabilities behavior with an unsupported value of kind Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Type checking for selectorArg in getStats is unnecessary Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: protocol can only contain ASCII Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Normative language in lower case Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: When DTMF can be sent Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] No <dfn> for toJSON in RTCSessionDescription Bernard Aboba via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Change ResourceInUse to OperationError Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Is keeping stats around a memory problem? stefan hakansson via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 August 2017

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Doodle for September Virtual Interim Stefan Håkansson LK
• [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.keyFramesReceived henbos via GitHub

Saturday, 12 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Clarify whether RTCRtpContributingSource members are live. jan-ivar via GitHub

Thursday, 10 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove event.receiver. jan-ivar via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 August 2017

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove SSRCs from RTCRtpEncodingParameters. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Adding defaults for RTCRtpEncodingParameters.active and priority Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Ignore RTCDataChannelInit.id if "negotiated" is false. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Define what an "associated" transceiver is. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify that ICE states should be "new" if there are no transports. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reference [[Direction]] internal slot from addTrack/removeTrack. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Specify how data channel priority enum is initialized from priority integer Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Formalize how createOffer interacts with identity providers. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Making getParameters/setParameters matching logic more deterministic. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] setParameters does input validation in parallel, and doesn't actually apply parameters? Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Ensure that "track" events fire before the SRD promise resolves. Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

Tuesday, 8 August 2017

• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Sunday, 6 August 2017

• Re: RTCSdpType "rollback" and why sdp field is needed? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: RTCSdpType "rollback" and why sdp field is needed? Bernard Aboba
• Re: RTCSdpType "rollback" and why sdp field is needed? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• RTCSdpType "rollback" and why sdp field is needed? Iñaki Baz Castillo

Friday, 4 August 2017

• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: s/Packet Loss Indication/Picture Loss Indication/ jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] pliCount typo jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo

Thursday, 3 August 2017

• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Stefan Håkansson LK

Wednesday, 2 August 2017

• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Randell Jesup
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Tuesday, 1 August 2017

• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: API or spec to limit a certain sending track Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Constructor for RTCDTMFToneChangeEvent does not validate format of tone Soares Chen via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 31 August 2017 14:53:58 UTC