- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:31:08 +0200
- To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: >> 1) Mangling the SDP is not the way to go (and theoretically will be prohibited). > > But this is not mangling SDP between CreateOffer and setLocat, it has having you server set bandwidth in the SDP. Sorry, right. b= should be set in the remote SDP. >> 2) Even if allowed, having to mangle the SDP and perform a fake SDP >> O/A local renegotiation is not cool at all. Note that, in my use case >> above, the bitrate limit is decided by the server at any time). > > not sugesting that But that would be the way: a setRemoteDescription(mangledOffer) + createAnswer() + setLocalDescription() every time the server wants to change the maximum bitrate of our track. >> 3) It does not work in PlanB if I send two video tracks because b= is >> per media (and not per "ssrc"). > > Plan B is not part of webrtc and no idea why we are even discussing it on this list Because UNfortunately WebRTC around the world is 95% Chrome based... And since Chrome does NOT want to implement TMMBR (they want to drop it) I cannot use the real standard for this (which would be TMMBR). :( Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 14:31:52 UTC