public-webauthn@w3.org from January 2022 by author

=JeffH

• [w3c/webauthn] f131d6: remove extraneous Note on permissions policy that ... (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] 55e64c: revise intro and define most of verification proce... (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] c3be90: Fix lowercase start of a sentence (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] 323789: minor editorial fixes (Friday, 14 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0bb9aa: authnr extension rather than client extension (Wednesday, 12 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] b8ec5b: polish Authenticator extension processing (Wednesday, 12 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] e23c4b: polish emlun's suggestion to not be a Note (Tuesday, 11 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] d52342: Apply emlun's suggestions, thx! (Tuesday, 11 January)

=JeffH via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 18 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Friday, 14 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 12 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Wednesday, 12 January)
• [webauthn] should reference "attestation statement format" registry instead of "extensions" registry (#1689) (Wednesday, 12 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 11 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Monday, 10 January)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Wednesday, 12 January)

Akshay Kumar via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Tuesday, 25 January)

Anders Rundgren via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)

Arshad Noor via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Thursday, 20 January)

David Waite via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Wednesday, 19 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 10 January)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] 112bfe: Merge pull request #1693 from w3c/issue-1687-crede... (Wednesday, 26 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass... (Wednesday, 26 January)
• [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass... (Tuesday, 25 January)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 26 January)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Change "create any credentials" to "create any assertions" in get() description (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Closed: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Change "create any credentials" to "create any assertions" in get() description (Tuesday, 25 January)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Device-bound key extension (#1658) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687) (Monday, 10 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Monday, 10 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Cross origin authentication without iframes (accommodating SPC in WebAuthn) (#1667) (Monday, 10 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 10 January)

Firstyear via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Device-bound key extension (#1658) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Tuesday, 11 January)

github-actions[bot] via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 26 January)

John Bradley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)

Lucas Garron via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Sunday, 16 January)

Martin Kreichgauer via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Friday, 14 January)

Matthew Miller via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Saturday, 22 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Saturday, 15 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 11 January)

Max Hata via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Thursday, 20 January)
• [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Thursday, 20 January)

Meydan Ozeri via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Wednesday, 5 January)

nadalin@prodigy.net

• 01/26/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 26 January)
• 01/12/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 12 January)

Nick Steele via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Akshay timeouts (Wednesday, 26 January)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640) (Wednesday, 5 January)

Tim Cappalli via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691) (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 10 January)

W3C Calendar

• Event Invitation: WebAuthn WG (Wednesday, 12 January)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 11 January)

謝宗儒 via GitHub

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Akshay timeouts (Sunday, 16 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 January 2022 22:41:19 UTC