Sunday, 29 February 2004
Friday, 27 February 2004
- Fwd: Auto: public-webarch-comments@w3.org autoreply
- Re: Please don't point to as yet empty Issues
- Re: Please don't point to as yet empty Issues
- Please don't point to as yet empty Issues
Thursday, 26 February 2004
Wednesday, 25 February 2004
Monday, 23 February 2004
- principles,...
- AWWW last call comments
- Re: Comments on Architecture of the World Wide Web, First Edition
Saturday, 21 February 2004
Friday, 20 February 2004
- RE: Recommended good practice on Namespace documents does not say "definitive"
- Recommended good practice on Namespace documents does not say "definitive"
- Re: Comments on Architecture of the World Wide Web, First Edition
- Webarch conformance model
- Authoritative server metadata
Wednesday, 18 February 2004
Tuesday, 17 February 2004
Friday, 13 February 2004
- Re: Simplify the text and separate the W3C politics
- 21 Comments on 9 December WebArch Draft
- Re: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
- Re: Schedule for RFC2396bis
- Re: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
- Re: Simplify the text and separate the W3C politics
Thursday, 12 February 2004
- Re: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
- Re: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
- Re: comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
- comment on URI and resource ownership in WebArch document
Friday, 6 February 2004
- Re: Comments on "Architecture of the World Wide Web, First Edition"
- Re: Comments on 9 December 2003 draft
- Re: Definition of "Web agents", "URI ownership" and typo
- Re: Simplify the text and separate the W3C politics
- Re: comments
- [closed] Re: The Worlds Greatest Vitamin!
- [closed] Re: Link from translation site
- Re: Initial Feedback on Web Arch W-D