Please don't point to as yet empty Issues

This is a specific example of a somewhat more general problem,
namely the way Issues (and Findings) are referenced in WebArch,
giving virtually no information about how these relate to the

Section 2.6 points to issue DerivedResources-43. When I'm finally
there (not easy because I'm starting from a print copy,,
the only thing I see is 'raised' and 'accepted'. So why should I
go there in the first place? And how can the authors guarantee
that this issue will indeed be relevant?

I propose to not point to issues that don't have reached a
certain maturity (in which case pointing to the finding is
probably better).

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Friday, 27 February 2004 14:41:29 UTC