public-wai-evaltf@w3.org from February 2012 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

• Cancell EvalTF Velleman, Eric
• Re: Stop Criteria Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Shadi Abou-Zahra

Monday, 27 February 2012

• Re: AW: Real world evaluation process RichardWarren
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Loïc Martínez Normand
• AW: Real world evaluation process Kerstin Probiesch
• Stop Criteria Kerstin Probiesch

Sunday, 26 February 2012

• Real world evaluation process RichardWarren

Saturday, 25 February 2012

• Re: CSUN 2012 : Website Evaluation and Testing with WCAG 2 Denis Boudreau
• Re: CSUN 2012 : Website Evaluation and Testing with WCAG 2 Elle
• Re: Conformance Statement Shadi Abou-Zahra
• URI vs URL (was Re: Eval TF : Sharing draft with others) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Eval TF : Sharing draft with others Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AW: CSUN Kerstin Probiesch
• CSUN Vivienne CONWAY
• CSUN 2012 : Website Evaluation and Testing with WCAG 2 Vincent François
• CSUN 2012 : Harmonizing WCAG Conformity Assessment Method Vincent François
• Conformance Statement Vivienne CONWAY
• Eval TF : Sharing draft with others Vivienne CONWAY

Friday, 24 February 2012

• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Elle

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• Minutes for Teleconference on 23 February 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Detlev Fischer
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Detlev Fischer
• Re: EvalTF agenda Alistair Garrison
• AW: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) RichardWarren
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Detlev Fischer
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Alistair Garrison
• RE: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Vivienne CONWAY
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AW: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AW: Comments to Editor's draft 2012-02-09 (an Observer awakes...) Kerstin Probiesch
• RE: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Vivienne CONWAY
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Alistair Garrison

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Overview of changes in new draft Velleman, Eric
• Re: Comments to Editor's draft 2012-02-09 (an Observer awakes...) Michael S Elledge
• updated Methodology document Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Velleman, Eric
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Kerstin Probiesch
• RE: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Vivienne CONWAY

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

• EvalTF agenda Velleman, Eric
• Re: Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Michael S Elledge

Monday, 20 February 2012

• My comments on the evaluation process Loïc Martínez Normand
• Comments to Editor's draft 2012-02-09 (an Observer awakes...) Loïc Martínez Normand
• My views on sampling Loïc Martínez Normand
• Minutes for Teleconference on 16 February 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Not Applicable (was Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal Michael S Elledge
• Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal Shadi Abou-Zahra

Sunday, 19 February 2012

• Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal RichardWarren
• Re: Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal Elle
• Re: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Vincent François
• Evaluation scheme with three options - proposal Kerstin Probiesch

Saturday, 18 February 2012

• RE: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Kathy Wahlbin

Friday, 17 February 2012

• Re: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Michael S Elledge
• RE: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Kiran Kaja

Thursday, 16 February 2012

• Re: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Léonie Watson
• Re: CSUN Attendance and Presentations Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Agenda EvalTF Martijn Houtepen
• CSUN Attendance and Presentations Elle
• Re: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Elle
• Re: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Michael S Elledge
• RE: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Velleman, Eric
• Re: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Alistair Garrison
• Re: Agenda EvalTF - regrets RichardWarren
• RE: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Velleman, Eric
• RE: Reminder: document naming continues in EOWG, feel free to contribute Velleman, Eric
• AW: Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Kerstin Probiesch
• Draft for 5.3 Procedure for evaluation Detlev Fischer
• Reminder: document naming continues in EOWG, feel free to contribute Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Agenda EvalTF Denis Boudreau

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

• Agenda EvalTF Velleman, Eric
• Reminder: next meeting tomorrow, 16 February 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Monday, 13 February 2012

• Re: WAI-ACT Clarification Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: WAI-ACT Clarification Alistair Garrison
• Re: WAI-ACT Clarification Shadi Abou-Zahra
• WAI-ACT Clarification Alistair Garrison

Sunday, 12 February 2012

• Minutes for Teleconference on 9 February 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Thursday, 9 February 2012

• AW: New version Methodology Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: New version Methodology Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: New version Methodology Velleman, Eric
• Re: New version Methodology RichardWarren
• AW: Role of Sufficient Techniques in the methodology (was: Re: proposed definition for "website") Kerstin Probiesch
• Role of Sufficient Techniques in the methodology (was: Re: proposed definition for "website") Detlev Fischer
• updated Methodology document Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Apologies Samuel Sirois
• Re: Apologies Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Apologies Elle

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• New version Methodology Velleman, Eric
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Michael S Elledge
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Detlev Fischer
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Elle
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Detlev Fischer
• RE: EvalTF agenda 9 February Boland Jr, Frederick E.

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• EvalTF agenda 9 February Velleman, Eric

Sunday, 5 February 2012

• Re: proposed definition for "website" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Shadi Abou-Zahra

Saturday, 4 February 2012

• Re: proposed definition for "website" RichardWarren
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Votis Konstantinos

Friday, 3 February 2012

• RE: proposed definition for "website" Don Raikes
• Re: AW: proposed definition for "website" Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: AW: proposed definition for "website" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: proposed definition for "website" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: proposed definition for "website" Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• AW: proposed definition for "website" Kerstin Probiesch
• RE: proposed definition for "website" Vivienne CONWAY
• proposed definition for "website" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Vivienne CONWAY
• Scope and Sample Testing Vivienne CONWAY

Thursday, 2 February 2012

• Minutes for Teleconference on 2 February 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• a more formal introduction Don Raikes
• RE: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• RE: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February Vivienne CONWAY
• Re: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance kvotis@iti.gr
• Re: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Detlev Fischer
• AW: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February Vincent François

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

• RE: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Sarah Swierenga
• Re: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Michael S Elledge
• Re: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance RichardWarren
• RE: EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Velleman, Eric
• RE: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February Velleman, Eric
• Re: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February Alistair Garrison
• EvalTF discussion overview 100% conformance Velleman, Eric

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2012 20:26:23 UTC