URI vs URL (was Re: Eval TF : Sharing draft with others)

Hi Vivienne,

Thanks for raising this editorial mismatch. It should be URI throughout.

Best,
   Shadi


On 25.2.2012 07:08, Vivienne CONWAY wrote:
> Hi Eric
> I was wondering if it is okay to share the link to the current draft with anyone, or if it's only for group members.  I thought I'd like to get some feedback from others particularly on the sampling methods, but will wait till I hear from you.
>
> On another topic, are we using URL or URI?- I thought I saw it referred to in different methods (I normally use URL)
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
> PhD Candidate&  Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
> Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
> v.conway@ecu.edu.au<mailto:v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
> v.conway@webkeyit.com<mailto:v.conway@webkeyit.com>
> Mob: 0415 383 673
>
> This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
>
> ________________________________
> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.
>
> CRICOS IPC 00279B
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 09:38:48 UTC