- From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:12:36 +0100
- To: "'Vivienne CONWAY'" <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>, "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>, "'Eval TF'" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, thanks for this definition. Just one comment: "may claim conformance to WCAG". Probably its just a language issue. Wouldn't that mean, that a website owner could claim conformance for example in the case that evaluators are testing with our methodology and evaluators testing with another methodology based upon a few pages do the rest? I think this we should avoid, cause users might think that all was tested according to our methodology. Best Kerstin > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vivienne CONWAY [mailto:v.conway@ecu.edu.au] > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Februar 2012 13:55 > An: Shadi Abou-Zahra; Eval TF > Betreff: RE: proposed definition for "website" > > HI Shadi > I think you've done marvellously (is that a word?) and really captured > the essence of our discussion. > > > Regards > > Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT > PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A. > Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd. > v.conway@ecu.edu.au > v.conway@webkeyit.com > Mob: 0415 383 673 > > This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the > individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or > telephone and destroy the original message. > ________________________________________ > From: Shadi Abou-Zahra [shadi@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 8:38 PM > To: Eval TF > Subject: proposed definition for "website" > > Dear Eval TF, > > Yesterday I took an action to propose a new definition for "website" > *in > the context of this document*. Currently the document says: > > [[ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/methodology/#website > Website - A coherent collection of one or more related web pages that > together provide common use or functionality. It includes static web > pages, dynamically generated web pages, and web applications. > ]] > > > I propose we add the following text to this definition: > > [[ > Websites are generally self-enclosed entities with key resources such > as > a homepage, login page, or other entry pages; help pages; sitemap; and > contact information. Web pages within a website typically have a common > design ("look and feel") and navigational structures. Examples of > websites in the context of this document include: > - Self-enclosed web appearances owned or provided by organizations; > - Self-enclosed sections of websites (sometimes referred to as > "sub-sites"), such as these of departments within organizations; > - Self-enclosed web applications and other web-based products. > > Arbitrary selections of individual web pages, especially those that do > not include complete processes, are not regarded as websites. > > Note: Selections of individual web pages that are not regarded as > websites may claim conformance to WCAG, but the evaluation of such > collections is outside the scope of this methodology. > ]] > > > Looking forward to your reactions! > > Best, > Shadi > > -- > Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ > Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office > Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) > Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) > > This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you > must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have > received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail > and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained > within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the > University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information > provided. > > CRICOS IPC 00279B
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 13:12:16 UTC