public-texttracks@w3.org from January 2015 by author

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 27939] New: Omissions from the VTTCue interface in the API (Saturday, 31 January)
• [Bug 27937] New: Omissions from the VTTCue interface in the API (Saturday, 31 January)
• [Bug 17483] WebVTT: Don't overlap cues that don't fit (Thursday, 29 January)

David Singer

• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Tuesday, 13 January)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Vtt subtitles and karaoke style - by nino (Thursday, 1 January)

Jeroen Wijering

• Re: Styling Captions (was RE: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT)) (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 21 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Monday, 19 January)

John Foliot

• Styling Captions (was RE: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT)) (Wednesday, 21 January)
• VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Monday, 19 January)

John Luther

• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 22 January)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Tuesday, 13 January)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Thursday, 15 January)

Simon Pieters

• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Thursday, 15 January)

Steve Heffernan

• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 14 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2015 20:25:36 UTC