Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT

correction, it was a FPWD.  Last-call doesn’t exist in the new process.  mea culpa
(we still need the evidence)

> On Jan 12, 2015, at 17:22 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Guys
> 
> we made a last-call version of the VTT spec. back in November, with a view to moving to Candidate Rec, in the Timed Text WG.  To move to CR, I need to show that ‘wide review’ has happened. Though we’ve sent out notes to a number of other standards bodies, I don’t think we have had much (euphemism) actual feedback.  Even if the spec. it totally perfect it would help if someone (preferably external to the W3C) said so.
> 
> If you know people who are implementing VTT or care about it, and could comment, that would be great.
> 
> (Just a reminder, we’re moving down the Rec. Track while not branching, because a number of places won’t refer to or otherwise use VTT unless it has a stable spec. with some status.)
> 
> Happy new year!
> 
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 18:09:10 UTC