Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT

http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/ was published on 3 November 2014 and
since then not a single bug has been filed and the only activity on
the list was the "Vtt subtitles and karaoke style - by nino" thread.
So unfortunately, I know of no evidence of any review, certainly not
wide review.

Philip

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:22 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> Guys
>
> we made a last-call version of the VTT spec. back in November, with a view to moving to Candidate Rec, in the Timed Text WG.  To move to CR, I need to show that ‘wide review’ has happened. Though we’ve sent out notes to a number of other standards bodies, I don’t think we have had much (euphemism) actual feedback.  Even if the spec. it totally perfect it would help if someone (preferably external to the W3C) said so.
>
> If you know people who are implementing VTT or care about it, and could comment, that would be great.
>
> (Just a reminder, we’re moving down the Rec. Track while not branching, because a number of places won’t refer to or otherwise use VTT unless it has a stable spec. with some status.)
>
> Happy new year!
>
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2015 19:03:54 UTC