- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:34:33 +0100
- To: "John Luther" <jluther@jwplayer.com>, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, "Jeroen Wijering" <jeroen@jwplayer.com>, steve@zencoder.com
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:29:14 +0100, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:57 , John Luther <jluther@jwplayer.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Dave, I was just writing to you. :-) >> >> Yes, we support WebVTT in JW Player and believe very strongly in the >> technology. +Jeroen has been more involved in that activity than I have. >> >> video.js supports is as well, I've added Steve to the thread. >> >> Do you think this lack of feedback is a serious risk to the spec >> advancing? This is surprising to me as every major desktop browser now >> has basic support (http://caniuse.com/#feat=webvtt), surely that counts >> as significant review & adoption? > > It counts as adoption, for sure, but we also need comments on the spec. > itself. Comments that have been addressed: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&component=WebVTT&list_id=50662&product=TextTracks%20CG&query_format=advanced Comments that are still open: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=WebVTT&list_id=50663&product=TextTracks%20CG&query_format=advanced There have also been comments sent to various mailing lists over the years, e.g. feedback from me in 2011 including the word "webvtt": https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=webvtt&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=simonp%40opera.com&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&period_month=&period_year=2011&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=&resultsperpage=20&sortby=date -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 09:33:19 UTC