- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:14:06 -0800
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
you can add the link i sent as an update to the oep notes elisa sent. i added the following 2 lines at the right place in the notes below: Deborah McGuinness sent an update to the January 30 OEP telecon minutes elisa sent at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0046.html look for ** below thx, d Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: >. . . are available at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html >and below in plain text. > >David Booth > >------------------------------------------------------- > > > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > Semantic Web Best Practices WG > >6 Feb 2006 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0026.html > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-irc > >Attendees > > Present > Elisa Kendall, David Wood, Ralph Swick, Raphael Troncy, > Fabien Gandon, Chris Halaschek, David Booth, Alistair Miles, > Ben Adida, Guus Schreiber > > Regrets > Jeremy Carroll, Jeff Pan, Libby Miller, Gary Ng, > Brian_McBride, Deborah McGuinness > > Chair > DWood > > Scribe > DBooth > >Contents > > * [4]Topics > 1. [5]Admin > 2. [6]2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14 > 3. [7]2.2 OMG: ODM review > 4. [8]2.3 Other > 5. [9]3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair) > 6. [10]3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris) > 7. [11]3.3 WordNet (Aldo) > 8. [12]3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy) > 9. [13]3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB) > 10. [14]3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben) > 11. [15]3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby) > 12. [16]3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve) > 13. [17]3.9 Tutorial Page > 14. [18]3.10 SE - Software Engineering > 15. [19]3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation > * [20]Summary of Action Items > _________________________________________________________ > > <RalphS> Previous: 2006-01-23 > [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes > > [21] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes > > <scribe> Scribe: DBooth > >Admin > > <dwood> Minutes from 12 Dec: > [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014. > html > > [22] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014.html > > <dwood> Minutes from 9 Jan: > [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes > > [23] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes > > DWood: We didn't record accepting some of our previous minutes. > > <dwood> Minutes from 23 Jan: > [24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes > > [24] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes > > <RalphS> [25]2005-12-12 record in HTML form > > [25] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html > > RESOLUTION: Accept minutes of 12 Dec, 9 Jan and 23 Jan. > > <dwood> PROPOSED next meeting 20 February 2006 > > <RalphS> 20 Feb is a US Holiday > > RESOLUTION: next meeting 20 February 2006 > > <RalphS> (I expect I will attend on the holiday if the WG meets > then) > > <Zakim> TBaker, you wanted to propose Cookbook for Working Draft > > DWood: Other agenda for today? > > Ben: RDF/A Primer > > <benadida> yes! > > <TBaker> thank you! > >2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14 > > Alistair: DBooth had action to request clarification from TAG on the > issue, and I had a VM TF action to ask whether 302 redirects are > okay, so I drafted something boiling it down to whether hTTP > responses are assertions. That also seemed like what was underlying > a lot of discussion on the thread and whether it is okay to use a > URI to name a person. I thought the httpRange-14 decision was to the > effect that HTTP response is an assertion. > ... Pat Hayes said he doesn't think this is a good idea to ask, that > this is still a research question. DWood also commented. > > <RalphS> +1 to Pat Hayes' arguments being well worth reading > > <dwood> ackk dbooth > > <RalphS> DBooth: my view has shifted as a result of the email > discussion > > <RalphS> ... I had felt that AWWW said that what the RDF/A Primer is > doing should not be done > > <RalphS> ... but after reading Pat Hayes' and Jeremy's remarks I see > there is a different interpretation of the TAG's writings > > <RalphS> ... I don't think it would be advisable to force the > question right now > > <RalphS> DavidW: is there a different question that is worth asking > the TAG? > > Ralph: I had been skeptical about whether it's worth asking the TAG > to resolve anything, because I didn't feel it was likely they would > answer quickly, so i'm confortable not pushing them on this. > > DWood: How about a purely SemWeb interpretation of the rang-14 > issue? > > Ralph: Not sure that's the best use of our time in the WG. But > publishing the docs that we are publishing (RDF/A Primer, Apache > Config Cookbook), both docs can touch on this question. i hope there > will be several venues in which this issue is discussed (including > this WG), but having an objective to resolve this in the next few > months may be reaching too far. > > <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to say something about webarch > > Alistair: When I first read the TAG's httpRange-14 decision, the way > I read it, I thought that the implied position was that an HTTP > response is effectively an assertion, and I think quite a few other > people read it that way as well. It could be useful to ask the > question of the TAG. They could then say no, that isn't what we > mean. > > <Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I think we can sidestep the issue > > <RalphS> DBooth: it's reasonable to send a question to the TAG > > <RalphS> ... with regard to our documents we can side-step the issue > > <RalphS> ... as it really comes down to the particular usage of an > ontology; whether that particular usage runs into the issue > > Ralph: I'm okay with posing the question to the TAG. Don't know howw > much background we need to supply on it. > > <RalphS> DBooth: my interpretation now is that an HTTP response is > an assertion but that assertion is different from what I originally > expected > > <RalphS> ... and perhaps also different from what Alistair expected > > <RalphS> ... I don't want the TAG to think the WG is asking a > question because we are waiting for a response but rather note that > we ran into the question and found confusion in the area > > <Guus> suggest that DavidB takes this action > > <RalphS> Ralph: "we noted some ambiguity ..." > > <RalphS> ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the > ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in > [26]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01] > >2.2 OMG: ODM review > > Elisa: No tools for QVT to validate. Delayed to April hoping for > tools. Can drop Jeremy's action. > > <scribe> ACTION: [DROPPED] jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM > [recorded in > [27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02] > >2.3 Other > > Elisa: I did review the WSDL 2.0 --> RDF mapping review verbally. > > <scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping > [recorded in > [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03] > > <scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] Guus to arrange telecon between himself, > Alistair and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4 > within 1 week in > [29]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ") > [recorded in > [30]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07] > > [29] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 > [30] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07 > > <aliman> guus did you just say you sent a mail to pfwg to arrange a > telecon? > > <Guus> wrt Action PFWG: it was rephrased as: "[NEW] ACTION: Guus to > finish action of 2.4 within 1 week [recorded in > [31]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02]" > > [31] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 > >3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair) > > Alistair: Nothing to report > > Ralph: Still expecting to do another WD of SKOS? > > Alistair: Undecided. > >3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris) > > Elisa: Had a call last week. Chris and Allen working with Ralph. > Action is now mine to work with Ralph to put it into CVS. > > <scribe> ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc > ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and > Alan) [recorded in > [32]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11] > [CONTINUED] > > [32] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11 > > <RalphS> [33]Elisa's report on action status for OEP actions > > [33] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0027.html > > <Guus> and i took the original action text for the agenda as it was > clearer > > Elisa: Still outstanding: Deb needs to be sure all comments are > captured from Galway mtg. > ... (on integration note). > > <RalphS> (hmm, actually, 0027 doesn't have the detail I'd thought) > > <RalphS> [34][ALL/OEP] Minutes of 2006-01-30 Telecon Elisa > 2006-02-06] > > [34] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html > ** Deborah McGuinness sent an update to the January 30 OEP telecon minutes elisa sent at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0046.html > > Elisa: QCR note is being reconstructed after Chris's hard drive > crash. Should be fine. > > <RalphS> (0042 has more action status detail) > > Guus: Voted on both notes alreadY? > > Elisa: Not sure. One minor change needed on QCR from Alan. > > <scribe> ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in > [35]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08] [DONE] > > [35] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08 > > <scribe> ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in > [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [DONE] > > [36] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03 > > <scribe> ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into > revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in > [37]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19] > [PENDING] > > [37] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19 > > <scribe> ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section > [recorded in > [38]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12] > [PENDING] > > [38] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12 > > Mike: Had a meeting where we made a detailed plan for the Note. I > updated a new draft, much more detailed. Missing code examples. > Chris Benzel will fill in code examples. Deb McGuiness will add an > example at the end of the note. > > Raphael: Still the version of 3 Nov. Is there a new URI for the > latest version? > > <aliman> what's the URI for the sem integration note? > > <scribe> ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem > integration note [recorded in > [39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10] > > Mike: You could review structure now or wait for complete draft. > > <RalphS> [40]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ points to > [41]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/ (currently > dated 3 Nov 2005) > > [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ > [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/ > > <scribe> ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review Semantic > Integration note > [42]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15] > [CONTINUED] [recorded in > [43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11] > > [42] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15 > > <scribe> ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of > semantics in time ontology note [recorded in > [44]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13] > [CONTINUED] > > [44] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13 > > Elisa: Evan pointed out an issue with the domain language. > > <scribe> ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in > [45]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09] > [CONTINUED] > > [45] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09 > > <RalphS> action#17 is to get part-whole ready for publication > > Elisa: Regarding part/whole note, Chris is reconstructing it from > hard drive crash. > ... N-ary relations note is waiting on a new ordering pattern from > Pat Hayes. Currently ordering of flight segments is implicit. Pat > has the action to fix this; not sure of how to get it into the note. > ... Discussion of additional potential notes. Chris has asked for a > Fluents note. > > <RalphS> "Chris is working on a Fluents note, " -- > [46]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042. > html > > [46] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html > > Elisa: Been talking about units of measure, what will happen to OEP. > Suggestion was to ask OEP to be rechartered. Chris might participate > at a lower level. No conclusion but we thought it is a good idea for > it to move forward. > > <RalphS> ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page > [recorded in > [47]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14] > > Guus: We only approved the Part/Whole note at the Galway F2F. > > <RalphS> ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f > on WG home page [recorded in > [48]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15] > >3.3 WordNet (Aldo) > > Guus: Mark has made a new version. Handles all comments so far. Want > reviewers. > > <RalphS> [49]RDF/OWL Representation of WordNet $Id: > 06-swbp-irc.txt,v 1.83 2006/02/06 19:36:11 swick Exp $ > > [49] >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html > > Guus: Main addition: Added intro for how to use it. > > <scribe> ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded > in [50]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16] > > <RalphS> action- 16 > > <scribe> ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded > in [51]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17] > > <scribe> ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to > the SWCG [recorded in > [52]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144. > html] [DONE] > > [52] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html > >3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy) > > <dwood> The editors hence propose publishing: > > <dwood> > [53]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > [53] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > <dwood> as a WG Note. > > <Guus> URI for my WNET action: > [54]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043. > html > > [54] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043.html > > PROPOSED to move WD to WG Note: > > [55]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161. > html > > [55] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161.html > > Ralph: Who reviewed? > > Guus: Evan and Ralph reviewed. > > Ralph: I'd have to re-read this before I can state an opinion. > > <RalphS> > [56]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > [56] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > <scribe> ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note > [57]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > by next meeting [recorded in > [58]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19] > > [57] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > <TBaker> > [59]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180. > html - see Section 3, "Response to reviews" > > [59] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html > >3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB) > > <RalphS> [60][VM] Telecon Tuesday (today) 15:00 UTC > > [60] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html > > Tom: Discussed suggestions made by reviewers. Want to propose the > draft for publication as WD. > > <TBaker> > [61]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01 > -18/ > > [61] >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01-18/ > > Tom: I believe we addressed major points made by reviewers. > > <dwood> > [62]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180. > html > > [62] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html > > DWood: Reviewers were Andreas and DBooth. > > <aliman> no amendments are being proposed > > Guus: I propose we put this on agenda for next time. > > <RalphS> DBooth: are we proposing to remove some words regarding > httpRange-14 from the cookbook? > > <RalphS> ... the intent of my action was to propose some words on > how to select which type of URI to use, which I think is still > relevant > > <RalphS> ... I recall doing some work on these words but might not > have posted to the list > > <RalphS> ... I think words can be written that avoid controversy > > <Zakim> aliman, you wanted to mention scope > > <RalphS> DBooth: I think it is relevant to say something about what > kind of URI to use > > <RalphS> Alistair: the TF summarized the scope of the document > [reads Introduction] > > <RalphS> ... the document scope is primarily for existing > vocabularies > > <RalphS> ... though Ralph did include a few words about choosing > names > > <RalphS> ... if David wants to propose some new text I'd be glad to > look > > <RalphS> DavidW: DBooth is free to propose words, the TF decides > whether or not to include the proposed words before asking the WG to > publish > > <RalphS> Alistair: in that case, I ask the WG to publish the draft > as-is and we consider any proposed new words in a future update > > <RalphS> DBooth: I'm comfortable with that. It sounds as though the > TF carefully bounded its scope to avoid the question of picking URIs > but I feel this is such an obvious question that it should be > covered > > <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask DBooth if these additional words > should hold a first WD > > <RalphS> Tom: can we take the resolution to advance the cookbook to > Working Draft on the next telecon, please > > Tom: I'd like to advance this to WD on 20 Feb. Would like any > proposed text before 14 Feb. > > <scribe> ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14 > Feb [recorded in > [63]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20] > > <scribe> ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document > by 14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in > [64]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21] > >3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben) > > Ben: Lots of discussion regarding WebArch issues. On mailing list 2 > wks ago I made a mistake and forgot to include a section that Mark > had written. Lots of positive feedback on them. Wanted to check > withh the WG that we're still okay to go to WD. > > <Guus> we have voted, so it is basicaly editor's discretion > > <Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I'm okay going okay with first WD > > Guus: We already voted on it. > ... No problem in going forward with it. > > <scribe> ACTION: [DONE] ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's > [recorded in > [65]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22] > > CONFIRMED: Document is ready to publish as a WD. > > <scribe> ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in > [66]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23] > >3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby) > > (skipped) > >3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve) > > (skippeed) > > <scribe> ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are > editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication > process if none [recorded in > [67]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30] [DONE] > > [67] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30 > >3.9 Tutorial Page > > (skipped) > >3.10 SE - Software Engineering > > <scribe> ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE > Primer [recorded in > [68]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24] > [PENDING] > > [68] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24 > > <scribe> ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded in > [69]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23] > [PENDING] > > [69] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23 > >3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation > > Jacco: Want to move the MM doc to public WD. Reviewers: Mike and > Guus. > > DWood: Has Jane Hunter contributed? > > Jacco: She contributed a first draft of example. I asked her to > revise it and have not heard back. > > <raphael> "Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version > available at > [70]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html > (v1.142) > > [70] >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html > > <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask about Jane Hunter's contribution > > Jacco: Chris Catton also promised to send a use case soon-ish. > > Ralph: Jane Hunter has not completed the invited expert materials. > > Jacco: She told me she had. > > Ralph: There's a form she needs to complete. > > Jacco: I think her name can be removed from the list of > contributors. > ... I'll forward Ralph her email about this. > > <dwood> Jacco, Please note that in Section 5.4, s/Apollo 7 Saturn > shuttle launch/Apollo 7 Saturn rocket launch/ > > <scribe> ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are > addressed by end of this week [recorded in > [71]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27] > > PROPOSED: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval of > changes. > > "Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version available at > [72]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html > (v1.142) > > [72] >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html > > Mike: it isn't linked from the BP web page. > > RESOLUTION: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval > of changes. > > Ralph: Do we have permission to use all the NASA and other images? > > <Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask a copyright question > > Jacco: Yes. > > <chalaschek> yes the nasa image is ok > > <aliman> bye > >Summary of Action Items > > [NEW] ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the > ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in > [73]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01] > [NEW] ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14 Feb > [recorded in > [74]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20] > [NEW] ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded in > [75]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17] > [NEW] ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded in > [76]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16] > [NEW] ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem integration > note [recorded in > [77]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10] > [NEW] ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are > addressed by end of this week [recorded in > [78]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27] > [NEW] ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page > [recorded in > [79]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14] > [NEW] ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note > [80]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > by next meeting [recorded in > [81]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19] > [NEW] ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f on > WG home page [recorded in > [82]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15] > [NEW] ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in > [83]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23] > [NEW] ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document by > 14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in > [84]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21] > > [80] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/ > > [PENDING] ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section > [recorded in > [85]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12] > [PENDING] ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc > ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and > Alan) [recorded in > [86]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11] > [PENDING] ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of > semantics in time ontology note [recorded in > [87]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13] > [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to arrange telecon between himself, Alistair > and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4 within 1 week > in [88]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ") > [recorded in > [89]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07] > [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into > revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in > [90]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19] > [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in > [91]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09] > [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded > in [92]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23] > [PENDING] ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE > Primer [recorded in > [93]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24] > [PENDING] ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review > Semantic Integration note > [94]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15] > [recorded in > [95]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11] > > [85] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12 > [86] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11 > [87] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13 > [88] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 > [89] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07 > [90] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19 > [91] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09 > [92] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23 > [93] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24 > [94] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15 > > [DONE] ACTION: ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's [recorded > in [96]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22] > [DONE] ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in > [97]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08] > [DONE] ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in > [98]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03] > [DONE] ACTION: Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping [recorded in > [99]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03] > [DONE] ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to > the SWCG [recorded in > [100]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144 > .html] > [DONE] ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are > editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication > process if none [recorded in > [101]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30] > > [97] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08 > [98] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03 > [100] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html > [101] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30 > > [DROPPED] ACTION: jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM [recorded in > [102]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02] > > [End of minutes] > _________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [103]scribe.perl version 1.122 > ([104]CVS log) > $Date: 2006/02/07 03:34:53 $ > > [103] >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [104] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > > > -- Deborah L. McGuinness Co-Director Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 16:14:29 UTC