- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:03:19 -0500
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
. . . are available at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html
and below in plain text.
David Booth
-------------------------------------------------------
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Semantic Web Best Practices WG
6 Feb 2006
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0026.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-irc
Attendees
Present
Elisa Kendall, David Wood, Ralph Swick, Raphael Troncy,
Fabien Gandon, Chris Halaschek, David Booth, Alistair Miles,
Ben Adida, Guus Schreiber
Regrets
Jeremy Carroll, Jeff Pan, Libby Miller, Gary Ng,
Brian_McBride, Deborah McGuinness
Chair
DWood
Scribe
DBooth
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Admin
2. [6]2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14
3. [7]2.2 OMG: ODM review
4. [8]2.3 Other
5. [9]3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair)
6. [10]3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris)
7. [11]3.3 WordNet (Aldo)
8. [12]3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy)
9. [13]3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB)
10. [14]3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben)
11. [15]3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby)
12. [16]3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve)
13. [17]3.9 Tutorial Page
14. [18]3.10 SE - Software Engineering
15. [19]3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation
* [20]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<RalphS> Previous: 2006-01-23
[21]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes
[21] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes
<scribe> Scribe: DBooth
Admin
<dwood> Minutes from 12 Dec:
[22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014.
html
[22]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0014.html
<dwood> Minutes from 9 Jan:
[23]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes
[23] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes
DWood: We didn't record accepting some of our previous minutes.
<dwood> Minutes from 23 Jan:
[24]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes
[24] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes
<RalphS> [25]2005-12-12 record in HTML form
[25] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Accept minutes of 12 Dec, 9 Jan and 23 Jan.
<dwood> PROPOSED next meeting 20 February 2006
<RalphS> 20 Feb is a US Holiday
RESOLUTION: next meeting 20 February 2006
<RalphS> (I expect I will attend on the holiday if the WG meets
then)
<Zakim> TBaker, you wanted to propose Cookbook for Working Draft
DWood: Other agenda for today?
Ben: RDF/A Primer
<benadida> yes!
<TBaker> thank you!
2.1 Proposed resolution httpRange-14
Alistair: DBooth had action to request clarification from TAG on the
issue, and I had a VM TF action to ask whether 302 redirects are
okay, so I drafted something boiling it down to whether hTTP
responses are assertions. That also seemed like what was underlying
a lot of discussion on the thread and whether it is okay to use a
URI to name a person. I thought the httpRange-14 decision was to the
effect that HTTP response is an assertion.
... Pat Hayes said he doesn't think this is a good idea to ask, that
this is still a research question. DWood also commented.
<RalphS> +1 to Pat Hayes' arguments being well worth reading
<dwood> ackk dbooth
<RalphS> DBooth: my view has shifted as a result of the email
discussion
<RalphS> ... I had felt that AWWW said that what the RDF/A Primer is
doing should not be done
<RalphS> ... but after reading Pat Hayes' and Jeremy's remarks I see
there is a different interpretation of the TAG's writings
<RalphS> ... I don't think it would be advisable to force the
question right now
<RalphS> DavidW: is there a different question that is worth asking
the TAG?
Ralph: I had been skeptical about whether it's worth asking the TAG
to resolve anything, because I didn't feel it was likely they would
answer quickly, so i'm confortable not pushing them on this.
DWood: How about a purely SemWeb interpretation of the rang-14
issue?
Ralph: Not sure that's the best use of our time in the WG. But
publishing the docs that we are publishing (RDF/A Primer, Apache
Config Cookbook), both docs can touch on this question. i hope there
will be several venues in which this issue is discussed (including
this WG), but having an objective to resolve this in the next few
months may be reaching too far.
<Zakim> aliman, you wanted to say something about webarch
Alistair: When I first read the TAG's httpRange-14 decision, the way
I read it, I thought that the implied position was that an HTTP
response is effectively an assertion, and I think quite a few other
people read it that way as well. It could be useful to ask the
question of the TAG. They could then say no, that isn't what we
mean.
<Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I think we can sidestep the issue
<RalphS> DBooth: it's reasonable to send a question to the TAG
<RalphS> ... with regard to our documents we can side-step the issue
<RalphS> ... as it really comes down to the particular usage of an
ontology; whether that particular usage runs into the issue
Ralph: I'm okay with posing the question to the TAG. Don't know howw
much background we need to supply on it.
<RalphS> DBooth: my interpretation now is that an HTTP response is
an assertion but that assertion is different from what I originally
expected
<RalphS> ... and perhaps also different from what Alistair expected
<RalphS> ... I don't want the TAG to think the WG is asking a
question because we are waiting for a response but rather note that
we ran into the question and found confusion in the area
<Guus> suggest that DavidB takes this action
<RalphS> Ralph: "we noted some ambiguity ..."
<RalphS> ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the
ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01]
2.2 OMG: ODM review
Elisa: No tools for QVT to validate. Delayed to April hoping for
tools. Can drop Jeremy's action.
<scribe> ACTION: [DROPPED] jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM
[recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02]
2.3 Other
Elisa: I did review the WSDL 2.0 --> RDF mapping review verbally.
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping
[recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: [PENDING] Guus to arrange telecon between himself,
Alistair and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4
within 1 week in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ")
[recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07]
[29] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02
[30] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07
<aliman> guus did you just say you sent a mail to pfwg to arrange a
telecon?
<Guus> wrt Action PFWG: it was rephrased as: "[NEW] ACTION: Guus to
finish action of 2.4 within 1 week [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02]"
[31] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02
3.1 PORT - Porting Thesaurii to RDF and OWL (Alistair)
Alistair: Nothing to report
Ralph: Still expecting to do another WD of SKOS?
Alistair: Undecided.
3.2 OEP - Ontology Engineering and Patterns (Deb/Chris)
Elisa: Had a call last week. Chris and Allen working with Ralph.
Action is now mine to work with Ralph to put it into CVS.
<scribe> ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc
ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and
Alan) [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
[CONTINUED]
[32] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11
<RalphS> [33]Elisa's report on action status for OEP actions
[33]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0027.html
<Guus> and i took the original action text for the agenda as it was
clearer
Elisa: Still outstanding: Deb needs to be sure all comments are
captured from Galway mtg.
... (on integration note).
<RalphS> (hmm, actually, 0027 doesn't have the detail I'd thought)
<RalphS> [34][ALL/OEP] Minutes of 2006-01-30 Telecon Elisa
2006-02-06]
[34]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html
Elisa: QCR note is being reconstructed after Chris's hard drive
crash. Should be fine.
<RalphS> (0042 has more action status detail)
Guus: Voted on both notes alreadY?
Elisa: Not sure. One minor change needed on QCR from Alan.
<scribe> ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08] [DONE]
[35] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08
<scribe> ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03] [DONE]
[36] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03
<scribe> ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into
revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
[PENDING]
[37] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19
<scribe> ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section
[recorded in
[38]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12]
[PENDING]
[38] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12
Mike: Had a meeting where we made a detailed plan for the Note. I
updated a new draft, much more detailed. Missing code examples.
Chris Benzel will fill in code examples. Deb McGuiness will add an
example at the end of the note.
Raphael: Still the version of 3 Nov. Is there a new URI for the
latest version?
<aliman> what's the URI for the sem integration note?
<scribe> ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem
integration note [recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10]
Mike: You could review structure now or wait for complete draft.
<RalphS> [40]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ points to
[41]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/ (currently
dated 3 Nov 2005)
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SemInt/
<scribe> ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review Semantic
Integration note
[42]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
[CONTINUED] [recorded in
[43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
[42] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15
<scribe> ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of
semantics in time ontology note [recorded in
[44]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13]
[CONTINUED]
[44] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13
Elisa: Evan pointed out an issue with the domain language.
<scribe> ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in
[45]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
[CONTINUED]
[45] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09
<RalphS> action#17 is to get part-whole ready for publication
Elisa: Regarding part/whole note, Chris is reconstructing it from
hard drive crash.
... N-ary relations note is waiting on a new ordering pattern from
Pat Hayes. Currently ordering of flight segments is implicit. Pat
has the action to fix this; not sure of how to get it into the note.
... Discussion of additional potential notes. Chris has asked for a
Fluents note.
<RalphS> "Chris is working on a Fluents note, " --
[46]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.
html
[46]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0042.html
Elisa: Been talking about units of measure, what will happen to OEP.
Suggestion was to ask OEP to be rechartered. Chris might participate
at a lower level. No conclusion but we thought it is a good idea for
it to move forward.
<RalphS> ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page
[recorded in
[47]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
Guus: We only approved the Part/Whole note at the Galway F2F.
<RalphS> ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f
on WG home page [recorded in
[48]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
3.3 WordNet (Aldo)
Guus: Mark has made a new version. Handles all comments so far. Want
reviewers.
<RalphS> [49]RDF/OWL Representation of WordNet $Id:
06-swbp-irc.txt,v 1.83 2006/02/06 19:36:11 swick Exp $
[49]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html
Guus: Main addition: Added intro for how to use it.
<scribe> ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded
in [50]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16]
<RalphS> action- 16
<scribe> ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded
in [51]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17]
<scribe> ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to
the SWCG [recorded in
[52]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.
html] [DONE]
[52]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html
3.4 XSCH - XML Schema Datatypes (Jeremy)
<dwood> The editors hence propose publishing:
<dwood>
[53]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
[53] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
<dwood> as a WG Note.
<Guus> URI for my WNET action:
[54]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043.
html
[54]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0043.html
PROPOSED to move WD to WG Note:
[55]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161.
html
[55]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0161.html
Ralph: Who reviewed?
Guus: Evan and Ralph reviewed.
Ralph: I'd have to re-read this before I can state an opinion.
<RalphS>
[56]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
[56] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
<scribe> ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note
[57]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
by next meeting [recorded in
[58]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
<TBaker>
[59]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.
html - see Section 3, "Response to reviews"
[59]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html
3.5 VM - Vocabulary Management (TomB)
<RalphS> [60][VM] Telecon Tuesday (today) 15:00 UTC
[60]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html
Tom: Discussed suggestions made by reviewers. Want to propose the
draft for publication as WD.
<TBaker>
[61]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01
-18/
[61]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2006-01-18/
Tom: I believe we addressed major points made by reviewers.
<dwood>
[62]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.
html
[62]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0180.html
DWood: Reviewers were Andreas and DBooth.
<aliman> no amendments are being proposed
Guus: I propose we put this on agenda for next time.
<RalphS> DBooth: are we proposing to remove some words regarding
httpRange-14 from the cookbook?
<RalphS> ... the intent of my action was to propose some words on
how to select which type of URI to use, which I think is still
relevant
<RalphS> ... I recall doing some work on these words but might not
have posted to the list
<RalphS> ... I think words can be written that avoid controversy
<Zakim> aliman, you wanted to mention scope
<RalphS> DBooth: I think it is relevant to say something about what
kind of URI to use
<RalphS> Alistair: the TF summarized the scope of the document
[reads Introduction]
<RalphS> ... the document scope is primarily for existing
vocabularies
<RalphS> ... though Ralph did include a few words about choosing
names
<RalphS> ... if David wants to propose some new text I'd be glad to
look
<RalphS> DavidW: DBooth is free to propose words, the TF decides
whether or not to include the proposed words before asking the WG to
publish
<RalphS> Alistair: in that case, I ask the WG to publish the draft
as-is and we consider any proposed new words in a future update
<RalphS> DBooth: I'm comfortable with that. It sounds as though the
TF carefully bounded its scope to avoid the question of picking URIs
but I feel this is such an obvious question that it should be
covered
<Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask DBooth if these additional words
should hold a first WD
<RalphS> Tom: can we take the resolution to advance the cookbook to
Working Draft on the next telecon, please
Tom: I'd like to advance this to WD on 20 Feb. Would like any
proposed text before 14 Feb.
<scribe> ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14
Feb [recorded in
[63]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20]
<scribe> ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document
by 14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in
[64]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21]
3.6 HTML - Embedding RDF in HTML (Ben)
Ben: Lots of discussion regarding WebArch issues. On mailing list 2
wks ago I made a mistake and forgot to include a section that Mark
had written. Lots of positive feedback on them. Wanted to check
withh the WG that we're still okay to go to WD.
<Guus> we have voted, so it is basicaly editor's discretion
<Zakim> dbooth, you wanted to say I'm okay going okay with first WD
Guus: We already voted on it.
... No problem in going forward with it.
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's
[recorded in
[65]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22]
CONFIRMED: Document is ready to publish as a WD.
<scribe> ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in
[66]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
3.7 ADTF - Applications and Demos (Libby)
(skipped)
3.8 RDFTM - RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability (Steve)
(skippeed)
<scribe> ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are
editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication
process if none [recorded in
[67]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30] [DONE]
[67] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30
3.9 Tutorial Page
(skipped)
3.10 SE - Software Engineering
<scribe> ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE
Primer [recorded in
[68]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24]
[PENDING]
[68] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24
<scribe> ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded in
[69]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
[PENDING]
[69] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23
3.11 MM - Multimedia Annotation
Jacco: Want to move the MM doc to public WD. Reviewers: Mike and
Guus.
DWood: Has Jane Hunter contributed?
Jacco: She contributed a first draft of example. I asked her to
revise it and have not heard back.
<raphael> "Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version
available at
[70]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
(v1.142)
[70]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
<Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask about Jane Hunter's contribution
Jacco: Chris Catton also promised to send a use case soon-ish.
Ralph: Jane Hunter has not completed the invited expert materials.
Jacco: She told me she had.
Ralph: There's a form she needs to complete.
Jacco: I think her name can be removed from the list of
contributors.
... I'll forward Ralph her email about this.
<dwood> Jacco, Please note that in Section 5.4, s/Apollo 7 Saturn
shuttle launch/Apollo 7 Saturn rocket launch/
<scribe> ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are
addressed by end of this week [recorded in
[71]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27]
PROPOSED: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval of
changes.
"Image annotation on the Semantic Web", latest version available at
[72]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
(v1.142)
[72]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html
Mike: it isn't linked from the BP web page.
RESOLUTION: To move the MM doc to WD contingent on Mike's approval
of changes.
Ralph: Do we have permission to use all the NASA and other images?
<Zakim> RalphS, you wanted to ask a copyright question
Jacco: Yes.
<chalaschek> yes the nasa image is ok
<aliman> bye
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: DBooth to draft a new message to the TAG noting the
ambiguity remaining in httpRange-14 and HTTP responses [recorded in
[73]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: DBooth to re-review Apache Cookbook document by 14 Feb
[recorded in
[74]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action20]
[NEW] ACTION: Guus to ask Brian to review Wordnet doc [recorded in
[75]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action17]
[NEW] ACTION: Jacco to do second review of WordNet doc [recorded in
[76]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action16]
[NEW] ACTION: Mike to put up latest version of the sem integration
note [recorded in
[77]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: Mike to re-review MM doc to see if his concerns are
addressed by end of this week [recorded in
[78]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action27]
[NEW] ACTION: Ralph add link to minutes of f2f on WG home page
[recorded in
[79]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
[NEW] ACTION: Ralph and Evan to provide reviews of Schema note
[80]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
by next meeting [recorded in
[81]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
[NEW] ACTION: Ralph check for link to minutes of March 2005 f2f on
WG home page [recorded in
[82]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
[NEW] ACTION: Ralph to publish RDF/A document [recorded in
[83]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
[NEW] ACTION: Tom to ask Andreas to re-review Cookbook document by
14 Feb in light of changes already made. [recorded in
[84]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action21]
[80] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20060127/
[PENDING] ACTION: Chris to move QCR todo's to the changes section
[recorded in
[85]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12]
[PENDING] ACTION: Elisa to work with Ralph to make part-whole doc
ready for publication (Elisa took over this action from Chris and
Alan) [recorded in
[86]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
[PENDING] ACTION: Evan to send note to Feng on discussion of
semantics in time ontology note [recorded in
[87]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to arrange telecon between himself, Alistair
and PFWG (rephrased as: "Guus to finish action of 2.4 within 1 week
in [88]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02 ")
[recorded in
[89]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to incorporate Alistair's comments into
revised draft of QCR draft, based on Alan's revision [recorded in
[90]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in
[91]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph cite relevant CG meeting records [recorded
in [92]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23]
[PENDING] ACTION: RalphS will make a publication request for the SE
Primer [recorded in
[93]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24]
[PENDING] ACTION: Raphael Georgios S, Fabien, Phil to review
Semantic Integration note
[94]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15]
[recorded in
[95]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action11]
[85] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action12
[86] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action11
[87] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action13
[88] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action02
[89] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/17-swbp-minutes.html#action07
[90] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action19
[91] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09
[92] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action23
[93] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action24
[94] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action15
[DONE] ACTION: ben to contact alistair on use of frag id's [recorded
in [96]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action22]
[DONE] ACTION: Deb to contact Chris and get status [recorded in
[97]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08]
[DONE] ACTION: Deb to report the plan of OEP [recorded in
[98]http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
[DONE] ACTION: Elisa to review WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping [recorded in
[99]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
[DONE] ACTION: Guus to bring issue wrt URI space for ontologies to
the SWCG [recorded in
[100]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144
.html]
[DONE] ACTION: Ralph check with Valentina on whether there are
editorial changes to rdftm-survey, then start WG Note publication
process if none [recorded in
[101]http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30]
[97] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/23-swbp-minutes.html#action08
[98] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/09-swbp-minutes.html#action03
[100]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0144.html
[101] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action30
[DROPPED] ACTION: jeremy to review OWL chapter of ODM [recorded in
[102]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-swbp-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [103]scribe.perl version 1.122
([104]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/02/07 03:34:53 $
[103]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[104] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 15:06:35 UTC