- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:58:06 -0800
- To: "Elisa F. Kendall" <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- CC: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
i will not be in the swbp call today. a couple of other quick notes now on elisa's notes on our telecon last week. Elisa F. Kendall wrote: > Present: Mike Uschold, Chris Welty, Evan Wallace, Elisa Kendall, > Deborah McGuinness > > 1. Discussion of Semantic Integration Note (Mike) > -- updates per Galway F2F captured, requires internal review > > -- 5 core mapping constructs identified, including > equivalentProperty, equivalentClass, sameAs, > differentFrom, subClassOf/subPropertyOf > -- discussion regarding whether or not this thread should be > dropped, instead saying that anything > with a formal basis can be useful for mapping ** [Action Deb] > to review -- feedback (preliminary) by 2/6, focus on mapping i owe some technical review. I did provide some comments that identified that some of the updates from the galway meetings between mike u and me and chris welty may have been dropped in the last version. For example, the contributor section of the document was dropped and there was a discussion concerning whether the updates from the comments i sent to mike u at the end of the f2f meeting were included. > > > 2. Discussion of revised draft QCR note (Chris) > -- Latest version is with Alan, since Chris' version was clobbered > when his hard drive died in Galway > ** [Action Elisa] to get the latest document from Alan, move to CVS > via Ralph, > > 3. Discussion of Part note (Chris) > -- Chris to get CVS installed on his new system and revise; continued > -- Both QCR and Part note are close, will need time to get it thru > w3c scripts, etc > > 4. Discussion of n-ary relations note (Chris) > -- waiting on new pattern from Pat -- implicitly have flight > segments in linear order, change to add > nextFlightSegment to make this explicit > -- not clear how to move this forward -- Pat has the action on the > revision to the use case ... > -- Natasha & Alan may not have time to rewrite the use case > -- continued > > 5. Discussion of Time note (Chris) > -- Review has been completed, and revision includes feedback (we think) > -- Could go straight to note status, Jerry should state whether or > not it addresses all feedback > -- Evan pointed out issue with domain language, example re: date of > travel > ** [Action Evan] to email Feng on this and other outstanding action > ** [Action Deb] to email Jerry on status, whether this should go > directly to note once Evan's issue > is addressed > > 6. Discussion of additional potential notes (Chris) > -- Chris is working on a Fluents note, there are other good topics > out there -- > people want to know how to do things, conclusion was to say "here > is an approach that has been used > successfully" rather than definitive "here is the best way"; > audience does want recommendation > > 7. Speculation on what will happen to OEP in the future. Suggestion > was that the rechartered BP working > group will include SKOS, VM, OEP. Discussion of some of the > additional work members are considering > (fluents, units of measure, etc.), Chris would participate at a lower > level of activity, Guus also, but not as chair. on my action to report, I brought up topics 6-7 above to identify what was reasonable. We believe we can get out the current qcr, nary, part-whole, and time notes. There is continued interest in getting out more notes past the end of the current group assuming extended charter. -- Deborah L. McGuinness Co-Director Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 17:58:28 UTC