- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:39:15 -0800
- To: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <43E789C3.7060707@sandsoft.com>
Present: Mike Uschold, Chris Welty, Evan Wallace, Elisa Kendall, Deborah McGuinness 1. Discussion of Semantic Integration Note (Mike) -- updates per Galway F2F captured, requires internal review -- 5 core mapping constructs identified, including equivalentProperty, equivalentClass, sameAs, differentFrom, subClassOf/subPropertyOf -- discussion regarding whether or not this thread should be dropped, instead saying that anything with a formal basis can be useful for mapping ** [Action Deb] to review -- feedback (preliminary) by 2/6, focus on mapping 2. Discussion of revised draft QCR note (Chris) -- Latest version is with Alan, since Chris' version was clobbered when his hard drive died in Galway ** [Action Elisa] to get the latest document from Alan, move to CVS via Ralph, 3. Discussion of Part note (Chris) -- Chris to get CVS installed on his new system and revise; continued -- Both QCR and Part note are close, will need time to get it thru w3c scripts, etc 4. Discussion of n-ary relations note (Chris) -- waiting on new pattern from Pat -- implicitly have flight segments in linear order, change to add nextFlightSegment to make this explicit -- not clear how to move this forward -- Pat has the action on the revision to the use case ... -- Natasha & Alan may not have time to rewrite the use case -- continued 5. Discussion of Time note (Chris) -- Review has been completed, and revision includes feedback (we think) -- Could go straight to note status, Jerry should state whether or not it addresses all feedback -- Evan pointed out issue with domain language, example re: date of travel ** [Action Evan] to email Feng on this and other outstanding action ** [Action Deb] to email Jerry on status, whether this should go directly to note once Evan's issue is addressed 6. Discussion of additional potential notes (Chris) -- Chris is working on a Fluents note, there are other good topics out there -- people want to know how to do things, conclusion was to say "here is an approach that has been used successfully" rather than definitive "here is the best way"; audience does want recommendation 7. Speculation on what will happen to OEP in the future. Suggestion was that the rechartered BP working group will include SKOS, VM, OEP. Discussion of some of the additional work members are considering (fluents, units of measure, etc.), Chris would participate at a lower level of activity, Guus also, but not as chair.
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 17:37:27 UTC