public-sdw-wg@w3.org from November 2015 by date

Monday, 30 November 2015

• RE: apologies for 2 Dec call Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Meeting Scott Simmons
• SDW Next Meeting Ed Parsons
• apologies for 2 Dec call Bill Roberts

Sunday, 29 November 2015

• Re: ACTION-96 linking to related identifiers Jon Blower

Thursday, 26 November 2015

• ACTION-96 linking to related identifiers Bill Roberts
• learning to speak Australian Bill Roberts
• FW: ACTION-104: Determine the rules for ogc quorum (Spatial Data on the Web Working Group) Little, Chris
• Shrinking the SSN ontology for Wot/IoT applications Kerry Taylor
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Frans Knibbe

Wednesday, 25 November 2015

• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Peter Baumann
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Frans Knibbe
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• SDWWG Telecon regrets - 11/25/2015 Joshua Lieberman
• RE: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Little, Chris
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Andrea Perego
• ACTION-94 a few thoughts Bill Roberts
• RE: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Little, Chris
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Joshua Lieberman
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Frans Knibbe
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Ed Parsons
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Raphaël Troncy
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Frans Knibbe
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• RE: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Svensson, Lars
• RE: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Little, Chris
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Frans Knibbe
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Andrea Perego
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it Clemens Portele
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Manolis Koubarakis
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Joshua Lieberman
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Bill Roberts
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Andrea Perego
• Re: ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Frans Knibbe
• ACTION-101 List of RDF vocabs relating to spatial data Bill Roberts
• Re: SDW meeting this week Frans Knibbe

Tuesday, 24 November 2015

• Re: SDW meeting this week Andrea Perego
• RE: SDW meeting this week Svensson, Lars
• SDW meeting this week Kerry Taylor

Monday, 23 November 2015

• WebEx now needs password Phil Archer

Sunday, 22 November 2015

• ACTION-85 Use Case Bart van Leeuwen

Friday, 20 November 2015

• Re: Discussion thread for review BP introduction Jeremy Tandy
• Re: GeoKnow Public Datasets [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] Frans Knibbe
• Fwd: GeoKnow Public Datasets [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] Frans Knibbe
• Fwd: GeoKnow Public Datasets [via Geospatial Semantic Web Community Group] Andrea Perego

Thursday, 19 November 2015

• Re: The 'valid time' requirement Frans Knibbe
• Re: Discussion thread for review BP introduction Frans Knibbe
• Re: Discussion thread for review BP introduction Jeremy Tandy
• [Minutes] 2015-11-18 Phil Archer
• Re: Discussion thread for review BP introduction Ed Parsons
• Re: Discussion thread for review BP introduction Frans Knibbe
• Discussion thread for review BP introduction Linda van den Brink

Wednesday, 18 November 2015

• Action-21 check ssn use cases and requirements Kerry Taylor
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Meeting Scott Simmons
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Meeting Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Meeting Clemens Portele
• Re: SDW Next Meeting Kerry Taylor

Monday, 16 November 2015

• SDW Next Meeting Ed Parsons

Thursday, 12 November 2015

• Fwd: Github help Kerry Taylor
• Re: sdwwg: meeting this week Joshua Lieberman

Wednesday, 11 November 2015

• [Minutes] 2015-11-11 Phil Archer
• RE: Requirement for 'Valid Time' Issue-16 Little, Chris
• Re: Requirement for 'Valid Time' Issue-16 Frans Knibbe
• Re: Requirement for 'Valid Time' Issue-16 Frans Knibbe
• RE: Requirement for 'Valid Time' Issue-16 Little, Chris
• Re: Requirement for 'Valid Time' Frans Knibbe
• Re: sdwwg: meeting this week matthew perry
• Re: sdwwg: meeting this week Jeremy Tandy
• RE: sdwwg: meeting this week Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

• Re: Requirement for 'Valid Time' issue-16 Kerry Taylor
• Requirement for 'Valid Time' Little, Chris
• [minutes] 2015-11-04 Phil Archer
• sdwwg: meeting this week Kerry Taylor

Monday, 9 November 2015

• Re: The Multiple types of coverage requirement Frans Knibbe

Friday, 6 November 2015

• Re: UCR issue 26 Frans Knibbe
• RE: UCR issue 26 Little, Chris

Thursday, 5 November 2015

• RE: SDWWG Next Meeting - Sapporo Update Svensson, Lars

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

• RE: UCR issue 26 Svensson, Lars

Monday, 2 November 2015

• SDWWG Next Meeting - Sapporo Update Ed Parsons
• RE: Joining the GeoJSON discussion Svensson, Lars
• RE: Joining the GeoJSON discussion Linda van den Brink

Last message date: Monday, 30 November 2015 23:41:42 UTC