RE: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it

Hi Clemens,

How about adding CSV, as work in progress with W3C http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/csv#w3c_all ?

Also, W3C Data Cubes/ISO17369 is a possibility, but no explicit geo aspects.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Clemens Portele [mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:13 PM
To: SDW WG Public List
Subject: Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it

I have uploaded it to Google docs. Try this link: 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V2A-SLMZli20ybN9e30ANyFBNdapB6UyVQnjN5eeqos/edit?usp=sharing


Best regards,
Clemens


> On 25 Nov 2015, at 14:03, Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:
> 
> Looking at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Nov/0052.html the table structure seems to be lost after the email is processed by the list software, so I will make the table available somewhere and send a link.
> 
> Clemens
> 
> 
>> On 25 Nov 2015, at 13:57, Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> below is a first attempt at such a matrix for vector data only.
>> 
>> Beside a review (I am not sure that everything is correct or 
>> adequate) this would need
>> - additional explanations in text,
>> - more work to align the terminology with the rest of the BP to make 
>> it understandable for the different target audiences,
>> - links to the specification for each format.
>> 
>> But before we work on this, I think we should have a discussion 
>> whether
>> - this is what we were looking for in general,
>> - the list of aspects is complete, too much, or missing important 
>> aspects (e.g. time support, closely coupled APIs / service 
>> interfaces, etc),
>> - the list of formats is ok or whether we need to remove / add some.
>> 
>> I hope the table is still readable once it passes the W3C list 
>> software :) … Best regards, Clemens

Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2015 13:34:53 UTC