Re: ACTION-98: Look at a list/matrix of the common formats (geojson, gml, rdf, json-ld) and what you can or can't achieve with it

Hi Frans,

in general I have only added formats that I have some familiarity with.

In the SpatialLite case, isn’t it more an implementation than a format? The linked wikipedia page states: "SpatiaLite supports several open standards from the OGC and has been listed as a reference implementation for the proposed GeoPackage standard."

GeoPackage is in the list.

Best regards,
Clemens



On 25 Nov 2015, at 14:25, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl<mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>> wrote:

Hello Clemens,

Have you considered adding SpatiaLite<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpatiaLite> to the collection of formats?

Greetings,
Frans

2015-11-25 14:16 GMT+01:00 Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>:
Hi, Clemens.

Just to say that an option would be to create a page in the SDW wiki.

Andrea


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Clemens Portele
<portele@interactive-instruments.de<mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote:
> Looking at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Nov/0052.html the table structure seems to be lost after the email is processed by the list software, so I will make the table available somewhere and send a link.
>
> Clemens
>
>
>> On 25 Nov 2015, at 13:57, Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de<mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> below is a first attempt at such a matrix for vector data only.
>>
>> Beside a review (I am not sure that everything is correct or adequate) this would need
>> - additional explanations in text,
>> - more work to align the terminology with the rest of the BP to make it understandable for the different target audiences,
>> - links to the specification for each format.
>>
>> But before we work on this, I think we should have a discussion whether
>> - this is what we were looking for in general,
>> - the list of aspects is complete, too much, or missing important aspects (e.g. time support, closely coupled APIs / service interfaces, etc),
>> - the list of formats is ok or whether we need to remove / add some.
>>
>> I hope the table is still readable once it passes the W3C list software :)
>> …
>> Best regards,
>> Clemens
>>
>



--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.