public-rdf-comments@w3.org from July 2012 by date

Tuesday, 31 July 2012

• Re: Encouraging canonical serializations of datatypes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Encouraging canonical serializations of datatypes in RDF David Booth
• Re: Encouraging canonical serializations of datatypes in RDF Gavin Carothers
• Re: Encouraging canonical serializations of datatypes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Encouraging canonical serializations of datatypes in RDF David Booth

Monday, 30 July 2012

• Re: Incorrect Content-Type on www.w3.org server Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Incorrect Content-Type on www.w3.org server Sandro Hawke
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Nathan
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Dan Brickley
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Ivan Herman

Sunday, 29 July 2012

• Re: Incorrect Content-Type on www.w3.org server Nathan
• Incorrect Content-Type on www.w3.org server Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility David Booth

Saturday, 28 July 2012

• Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility Pat Hayes
• Re: Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 25 July 2012

• Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility Dan Brickley
• Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility David Booth

Friday, 20 July 2012

• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Nathan

Thursday, 19 July 2012

• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Pat Hayes
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" David Booth
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Nathan
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Pat Hayes
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Pat Hayes
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Pat Hayes
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Pat Hayes
• Re: Turtle parsing Andy Seaborne
• Re: Turtle parsing Mathias Hasselmann
• Re: Turtle parsing Andy Seaborne
• Turtle parsing - follow up Paul Gearon
• Re: RDF 1.1 IRIs and %-escaping Andy Seaborne
• Turtle parsing Paul Gearon
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" David Booth
• Re: RDF 1.1 IRIs and %-escaping David Booth
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Nathan
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" David Booth

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Jan Wielemaker

Thursday, 19 July 2012

• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RDF 1.1 IRIs and %-escaping Graham Klyne
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Steve Harris
• RE: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Nathan
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Gavin Carothers
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 18 July 2012

• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review David Booth
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" Nathan
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review David Booth
• Re: [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" David Booth
• [Editorial] Concise definition of "blank node" needed David Booth
• [Editorial] "blank nodes do not denote specific resources" David Booth
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode David Booth
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Souripriya Das
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Yves Raimond
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Steve Harris
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Dan Brickley
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Andy Seaborne
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Yves Raimond
• Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode Richard Cyganiak
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Mathias Hasselmann
• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Gavin Carothers
• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Andy Seaborne
• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? David Booth
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Steve Harris
• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Mathias Hasselmann
• Re: Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Gavin Carothers

Monday, 16 July 2012

• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Nathan
• Re: in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Dan Brickley
• in...of syntax Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Tim Berners-Lee

Saturday, 14 July 2012

• Turtle: Prefixes now can contain colons (":")? Mathias Hasselmann

Monday, 16 July 2012

• Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode David Booth

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

• Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review David Wood
• Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Turtle Last Call: Request for Review Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF" Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

• Re: Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF" Gavin Carothers

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:24:32 UTC