W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Skolemization .well-known prefix: genid --> bnode or blanknode

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:13:09 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7D94DF7A-4258-4644-88B3-34EC76109241@cyganiak.de>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
David,

On 16 Jul 2012, at 03:52, David Booth wrote:
> I am surprised to see that the ".well-known" prefix for skolemized
> bnodes is currently "genid":
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-skolemization
> I think "bnode" or "blanknode" would be much more suggestive of its
> purpose, and therefore more helpful to the community.  Many (most?)
> instance URIs are generated anyway, so calling it a "genid" isn't saying
> much.
> 
> I suggest changing "genid" to "bnode" or "blanknode".

There was a poll between the alternatives "bnode", "genid" and "skolem" here:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-25

"genid" won. IIRC the argument that carried the day against "bnode" was: "It's not a bnode."

Lots of background discussion linked from here:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/40

and in two threads named "Re: genid:" and "Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics" in April 2011:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/thread.html

Best,
Richard


> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
> 
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 09:13:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:30 UTC