- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:43:45 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 2012-07-18, at 12:27, Dan Brickley wrote: …snip… >> A massive +1. Having been burned by that in the past, it is indeed a very good argument for it. >> >> The argument about generating Turtle data from pre-existing hashes is also a very good one. I've written a few of these 'RDFizers' in the past, just recursively going through a hash and outputting a string that happens to be valid Turtle (see https://github.com/moustaki/bbc-serialiser for example, which is currently in use on a few BBC websites) - and having a way to write triples in both directions make that a *lot* easier... > > If (a) it could be done identically in SPARQL 1.1 and Turtle (b) it > was done with punctuation (e.g. ^) rather than pseudo-English, i'd be > supportive. > > (Is 'is isPrimaryTopicOf of' the same as 'primaryTopic'? The existence > of isPrimaryTopicOf is a good reason for exploring such a design...) > > Every difference we create between SPARQL and Turtle diminishes the > value and teachability of both… +1 - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 11:44:22 UTC