W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Redefining the RDF abbreviation for more accessibility

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:17:20 -0400
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1343531840.2725.59036.camel@dbooth-laptop>
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 21:28 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
[ . . . ]
>  'resource' always was an awkward word. Even if we don't do this
> officially this could come in useful as an informal slogan for what
> RDF is all about. 

I guess another option would be just to tack on a secondary name instead
of changing the primary name:

  RDF: Resource Description Framework (a/k/a Reusable Data Framework)

BTW, I've been enjoying the amusing suggestions!

David Booth, Ph.D.

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 03:17:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:30 UTC