public-ixml@w3.org from March 2024 by author

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• ixml and operator precedence grammars (was: Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)
• a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)
• draft agenda for invisible XML community group call Tuesday 19 March 2024 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: (ACTION) On a new grammar for IRIs (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• action 2024-02-20-a ? links to our report (Tuesday, 5 March)
• minutes from ixml CG call of 5 March 2024 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: (ACTION) On a new grammar for IRIs (Tuesday, 5 March)
• prohibiting final full stops in names (action 2023-11-28-e) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• draft agenda for Invisible XML CG call Tuesday 5 March 2024 (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Saturday, 2 March)
• another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Friday, 1 March)

Jim Saiya

• Re: another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Saturday, 2 March)

John Lumley

• iXML CG Meeting Minutes 2024mar19 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: More on grammar metadata (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: minutes from ixml CG call of 5 March 2024 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Saturday, 2 March)

LdBeth

• Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)

Liam R. E. Quin

• Re: a surprising whitespace-related ambiguity (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)

Norm Tovey-Walsh

• EBNF to BNF document (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: More on grammar metadata (Friday, 15 March)
• More on grammar metadata (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: minutes from ixml CG call of 5 March 2024 (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: prohibiting final full stops in names (action 2023-11-28-e) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: (ACTION) On a new grammar for IRIs (Tuesday, 5 March)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: draft agenda for invisible XML community group call Tuesday 19 March 2024 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Daylight (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: (ACTION) On a new grammar for IRIs (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Alternative syntaxes for the prolog (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: another ixml we should probably point to, to say "not us" (Monday, 4 March)

Last message date: Friday, 22 March 2024 17:56:20 UTC