Re: (ACTION) On a new grammar for IRIs

> So I'll be happier with a proposal to replace the current ixml grammars in the samples/URI directory, or add one or more additional ones

I don’t see any reason *not* to provide a grammar that’s faithful to the RFC, even if we also include an additional grammar that produces different results.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica